Skip to content

ARCHITECT 3L80-32Recalls & reported problems

Abbott GmbH · Carbon Dioxide · Class 2

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00380740161538), received between Sep 1, 2020 and Jul 21, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Low Test Results” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Low Test Results3
  • High Test Results1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2025Low Test Results; Low Test Results

    THE CUSTOMER OBSERVED FALSELY DEPRESSED CARBON DIOXIDE RESULTS GENERATED ON THE ARCHITECT C16000 PROCESSING MODULE FOR ONE PATIENT. THE FOLLOWING DATA WAS PROVIDED: ON (B)(6) 2025, SID: (B)(6): INITIAL RESULT = 9.2 MMOL/L, REPEAT = 9.9 MMOL/L, VITROS RESULT = 18 MMOL/L, RADIOMETER RESULT = 23 MMOL/L. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THE SAMPLE IS LIPEMIC. NO IMPACT TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22553539 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2024High Test Results; High Test Results

    THE CUSTOMER OBSERVED FALSELY ELEVATED CO2 RESULTS GENERATED ON THE ARCHITECT C16000 PROCESSING MODULE FOR ONE SAMPLE. THE CUSTOMER REPEATED THE SAMPLE ON ANOTHER ARCHITECT AND THE RESULTS WERE LOWER. THE FOLLOWING DATA WAS PROVIDED: INITIAL RESULT = 32 MMOL/L REPEAT RESULTS= 25 AND 26 MMOL/L NO IMPACT TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18789983 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Low Test Results; Low Test Results

    THE CUSTOMER OBSERVED A FALSELY DEPRESSED CARBON DIOXIDE RESULT GENERATED ON THE ARCHITECT C16000 PROCESSING MODULE FOR ONE SAMPLE. RESULTS PROVIDED: INITIAL RESULT = 6.1 MMOL/L, REPEAT RESULT = 22.9 MMOL/L NO IMPACT TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16831177 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 1, 2020Low Test Results; Low Test Results

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED FALSELY DEPRESSED ARCHITECT CO2 RESULTS FOR FOUR PATIENTS. THE CUSTOMER ALLEGES HAVING TO ISSUE ABOUT 500 CORRECTED CO2 REPORTS. HOWEVER, NO DATA IS AVAILABLE FOR THIS ALLEGATION. THE CUSTOMER DID PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR FOUR PATIENTS: PT#1 (B)(6): INITIAL = 16 MMOL/L, REPEAT = 22 MMOL/L; PT# 2: (B)(6)INITIAL = 20 MMOL/L, REPEAT = 27 MMOL/L; PT#3: (B)(6): INITIAL = 14 MMOL/L, REPEAT = 25 MMOL/L; PT#4: (B)(6): INITIAL = 16 MMOL/L, REPEAT = 25 MMOL/L (NORMAL RANGE: 20-29 MMOL/L). THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10476215 ↗

Other ENZYMATIC, CARBON-DIOXIDE devices

All ENZYMATIC, CARBON-DIOXIDE devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.