BD Respiratory Viral Panel for BD MAX™ System 445373Recalls & reported problems
Becton, Dickinson And Company · BD Respiratory Viral Panel for BD MAX™ System · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00382904453732), received between Aug 19, 2024 and Mar 16, 2026 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “False Positive Result” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- False Positive Result5
- False Negative Result2
- Incorrect Measurement1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 16, 2026False Negative Result
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF BD MAX¿ RESPIRATORY VIRAL PANEL, A FALSE NEGATIVE INFLUENZA A PATIENT RESULT WAS OBTAINED. SAMPLE WAS REPEAT TESTED AND REMAINED INFLUENZA A NEGATIVE. SAMPLE WAS THEN TESTED ON FILMARRAY, WHICH IDENTIFIED THE SAMPLE AS INFLUENZA A POSITIVE. INFLUENZA A TYPING LDT WAS ALSO PERFORMED ON RESIDUAL SAMPLE AND THE RESULT WAS INFLUENZA A POSITIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24605267 ↗MalfunctionMar 16, 2026False Negative Result
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF BD MAX¿ RESPIRATORY VIRAL PANEL, A FALSE NEGATIVE INFLUENZA A PATIENT RESULT WAS OBTAINED. SAMPLE WAS REPEAT TESTED AND REMAINED INFLUENZA A NEGATIVE. SAMPLE WAS THEN TESTED ON FILMARRAY, WHICH IDENTIFIED THE SAMPLE AS INFLUENZA A POSITIVE. INFLUENZA A TYPING LDT WAS ALSO PERFORMED ON RESIDUAL SAMPLE AND THE RESULT WAS INFLUENZA A POSITIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24604950 ↗MalfunctionOct 25, 2024False Positive Result; False Positive Result
REPORT 4 OF 5: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE BD RESPIRATORY VIRAL PANEL FOR BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, A FLU A FALSE POSITIVE PATIENT RESULT WAS OBTAINED. SAMPLES WERE REPEATED ON CEPHEID GENEXPERT AND WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20533212 ↗MalfunctionOct 25, 2024False Positive Result; False Positive Result
REPORT 5 OF 5: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE BD RESPIRATORY VIRAL PANEL FOR BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, A FLU A FALSE POSITIVE PATIENT RESULT WAS OBTAINED. SAMPLES WERE REPEATED ON CEPHEID GENEXPERT AND WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20533137 ↗MalfunctionOct 25, 2024False Positive Result; False Positive Result
REPORT 2 OF 5: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE BD RESPIRATORY VIRAL PANEL FOR BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, A FLU A FALSE POSITIVE PATIENT RESULT WAS OBTAINED. SAMPLES WERE REPEATED ON CEPHEID GENEXPERT AND WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20532343 ↗MalfunctionOct 25, 2024False Positive Result; False Positive Result
REPORT 3 OF 5: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE BD RESPIRATORY VIRAL PANEL FOR BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, A FLU A FALSE POSITIVE PATIENT RESULT WAS OBTAINED. SAMPLES WERE REPEATED ON CEPHEID GENEXPERT AND WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20532236 ↗MalfunctionOct 25, 2024False Positive Result; False Positive Result
REPORT 1 OF 5: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE BD RESPIRATORY VIRAL PANEL FOR BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, A FLU A FALSE POSITIVE PATIENT RESULT WAS OBTAINED. SAMPLES WERE REPEATED ON CEPHEID GENEXPERT AND WERE NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20531999 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2024Incorrect Measurement; Incorrect Measurement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF BD RESPIRATORY VIRAL PANEL FOR BD MAX¿ SYSTEM, A DISCREPANT PATIENT COVID RESULT WAS OBTAINED. THE SAMPLE WAS POSITIVE, BUT THEN UPON REPEAT IT WAS NEGATIVE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT IMPACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19999612 ↗
Other Multi-target respiratory specimen nucleic acid test including SARS-CoV-2 and other microbial agents devices
- BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 423742Biofire Diagnostics, LLC · Multi-Target Respiratory Specimen Nucleic Acid Test Including Sars-Cov-2 And Other Microbial Agents3 recalls4 reports
- Panther Fusion® KIT, SARS/FLU A/B/RSV REAG CARTRDG, 96T, FUS, IVDHologic, Inc. · Multi-target respiratory specimen nucleic acid test including SARS-CoV-2 and other microbial agents1 recall7 reports
- QIAstat-Dx® Respiratory Panel Plus V1QIAGEN GmbH · Multi-Target Respiratory Specimen Nucleic Acid Test Including Sars-Cov-2 And Other Microbial Agents1 recall0 reports
- DASH® SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test Kit SG-0006Nuclein, LLC · Multi-Target Respiratory Specimen Nucleic Acid Test Including Sars-Cov-2 And Other Microbial Agents1 recall0 reports
- GeneXpert® XPRS4PLEX-10Cepheid · Multi-Target Respiratory Specimen Nucleic Acid Test Including Sars-Cov-2 And Other Microbial Agents1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page