NIPRO DISPOSABLE SYRINGE JD+10LRecalls & reported problems
Nipro Medical Corporation · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00383790001007), received between Oct 5, 2020 and Jan 4, 2021 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Material Fragmentation2
- Entrapment of Device1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 4, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
LUER LOCK PIECE BROKE OFF WHEN ATTACHING TO THE NEEDLE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11114682 ↗MalfunctionJan 4, 2021Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
WHEN THE STAFF CONNECTS THE SYRINGE TO THE HEPARIN LINE, AVF NEEDLE LUER LOCK, AND DIALYSIS CATHETER, THE LUER LOCK TIP BREAKS OFF. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11114487 ↗InjuryDec 2, 2020Break; Break
SYRINGE TIP BROKE OFF INSIDE OF PATIENT'S DIALYSIS CATHETER, PRIOR TO TREATMENT, PULLING HEPARIN OUT OF THE CATHETER LUMEN. NO INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS OR HOSPITALIZATION WERE REPORTED. THE SYRINGE TIP WAS REMOVED WITH NEEDLE NOSE PLYERS. PATIENT RETURNED TO THEIR REGULAR SCHEDULED TREATMENT WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES. BRAND OF DIALYSIS CATHETER IS UNKNOWN. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRING WITH BLOODLINES(BRAUN STREAMLINE AIRLESS SYSTEM) OCCURRING WITH PATIENTS USING AVF GRAFT/FISTULA. WHILE TWISTING THE NEEDLE INTO THE MEDICATION PORT, AS WELL AS WHILE PLACING A NEEDLE ON THE SYRINGE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10931898 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2020Break; Break
SYRINGE TIP BROKE OFF INSIDE OF PATIENT'S DIALYSIS CATHETER, PRIOR TO TREATMENT, PULLING HEPARIN OUT OF THE CATHETER LUMEN. NO INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS OR HOSPITALIZATION WERE REPORTED. THE SYRINGE TIP WAS REMOVED WITH NEEDLE NOSE PLYERS. PATIENT RETURNED TO THEIR REGULAR SCHEDULED TREATMENT WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES. BRAND OF DIALYSIS CATHETER IS UNKNOWN. CUSTOMER ALSO REPORTED THE SAME ISSUE OCCURRING WITH BLOODLINES(BRAUN STREAMLINE AIRLESS SYSTEM) OCCURRING WITH PATIENTS USING AVF GRAFT/FISTULA. WHILE TWISTING THE NEEDLE INTO THE MEDICATION PORT, AS WELL AS WHILE PLACING A NEEDLE ON THE SYRINGE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10930981 ↗InjuryOct 5, 2020Entrapment of Device; Entrapment of Device
STAFF REMOVED THE TEGO (DAY TO CHANGE THEM) & ATTACHED AN EMPTY / NO NEEDLE 10CC SYRINGE TO WITHDRAW WHAT WAS PRESENTLY IN THE VENOUS LUMEN. STAFF OBTAINED APPROX. 5 CC SOLUTION AND IMMEDIATELY WENT TO PUT THE NEW TEGO ON TO THE VENOUS LUMEN. AT THAT TIME THE STAFF NOTICED THERE WAS SOMETHING INSIDE THE LUMEN THAT WAS PREVENTING FROM ATTACHING THE NEW TEGO. STAFF ATTEMPTED FOR 20 MIN, TO GET THIS PLASTIC PIECE OUT OF THE VENOUS LUMEN. TREATMENT LINES COULD NOT BE ATTACHED TO THE VENOUS LUMEN TO START THE TREATMENT. PATIENT'S PHYSICIAN WAS NOTIFIED. THE PHYSICIAN WENT TO THE CLINIC TO SEE THE SITUATION AND ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE PLASTIC THAT WAS IN THE VENOUS LUMEN. HE WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. DOCTOR CALLED THE VASCULAR PHYSICIAN TO TELL HIM ABOUT THE SITUATION. THE VASCULAR PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO GET THE PLASTIC PIECE OUT OF THE VENOUS LUMEN. ACCORDING TO THE STAFF, THE PATIENT WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE THEIR SCHEDULED TREATMENT. INCIDENT OCCURRED DURING CATHETER PREPARATION FOR TREATMENT, BEFORE TREATMENT STARTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 10632314 ↗
Other Syringe, piston devices
- BD Luer-Lok 309657Becton, Dickinson And Company · Syringe, piston1,266 reports
- BD Luer-Lok 309653Becton, Dickinson And Company · Syringe, piston948 reports
- BD Luer-Lok 309628Becton, Dickinson And Company · Syringe, piston862 reports
- N/A 302995Becton, Dickinson And Company · Syringe, piston1 recall537 reports
- BD Plastipak Syringe 300865Becton, Dickinson And Company · Syringe, piston515 reports
- N/A 302830Becton, Dickinson And Company · Syringe, piston462 reports
- N/A 302832Becton, Dickinson And Company · Syringe, piston424 reports
- BD Ultra-Fine 328468Becton, Dickinson and Company Inc · Syringe, piston323 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page