Skip to content

DreamStation Go DSGHRecalls & reported problems

Respironics, Inc. · DreamStation Go Heated Respiratory Humidifier, Domestic · Class 2

All models of Philips DreamStation (190) · DreamStation Go (16)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00606959053861), received between Nov 6, 2025 and Nov 6, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Contamination1
  • Degraded1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2025Contamination; Degraded; Contamination; Degraded

    THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED ABOUT THE VOLUNTARY FIELD SAFETY NOTICE / RECALL NOTIFICATION RELATED TO THE SOUND ABATEMENT FOAM IN CERTAIN CPAP, BIPAP, AND MECHANICAL VENTILATOR DEVICES. THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED INFORMATION ALLEGING AN ISSUE RELATED TO A CPAP DEVICE'S SOUND ABATEMENT FOAM. THE PATIENT HAS ALLEGED VISUALIZATION OF PARTICLES. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF SERIOUS PATIENTS, HARM OR INJURY. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED BY THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT INVESTIGATION LABORATORY FOR INVESTIGATION. DURING INVESTIGATION THE MANUFACTURER OBSERVED AN UNKNOWN WHITE DUST-LIKE CONTAMINATION ON THE CPAP SEAL ALONG WITH SOME SMALL BLACK HAIRS/FIBERS. DURING INVESTIGATION THE MANUFACTURER OBSERVED A TINY PIECE OF UNKNOWN BLACK CONTAMINATION, INCONSISTENT WITH SOUND ABATEMENT FOAM, AND A FEW TINY BLACK HAIRS/FIBERS IN THE BOTTOM OF THE BLOWER BOX. A KERATIN-LIKE SUBSTANCE WAS OBSERVED ON THE BLOWER BOX OUTLET. EVIDENCE OF SOUND ABATEMENT FOAM DEGRADATION/BREAKDOWN WAS NOT OBSERVED. THE MANUFACTURER USED A FITT (FOAM INTEGRITY TEST TOOL) AND COULD NOT CONFIRM THE PRESENCE OF DEGRADED SOUND ABATEMENT FOAM. THE DEVICE'S EVENT LOGS WERE DOWN

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23483730 ↗

Other VENTILATOR, NON-CONTINUOUS (RESPIRATOR) devices

All VENTILATOR, NON-CONTINUOUS (RESPIRATOR) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page