Soft/Fibra® Spring Clip G-6050Recalls & reported problems
Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Indicated for surgical clamping during cardiovascular peripheral vascular, and general surgery. · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00607915118013), received between Jun 18, 2025 and Jun 18, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Open or Close” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Open or Close1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 18, 2025Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close
PROCEDURE: KIDNEY TRANSPLANT EVENT DESCRIPTION: [HOSPITAL NAME] MODEL #: G-6050, LOT #: 1533455. SUMMARY: DURING THE CASE, THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO "BACKFILL" THE TRANSPLANTED KIDNEY. IN ORDER TO PERFORM THIS, THEY USED A SPRING CLIP, WHICH WAS PASSED TO THE ATTENDING ON A SPRING CLIP LOADER. THE SPRING CLIP WAS SUCCESSFULLY PLACED ON THE PATIENT'S KIDNEY, AND THEN THE ATTENDING USED PAPAVERINE, A MEDICATION, IN ADDITION. AFTER THIS WAS USED, THE SPRING CLIP WAS REMOVED, AT WHICH TIME THE DEVICE BROKE INTO TWO SEPARATE PIECES. THE DEVICE WAS SEQUESTERED, AND THEN PASSED OFF THE FIELD. THE LOT NUMBER FOR THE DEVICE IS AS FOLLOWS: 1533455. THIS LOT NUMBER AND EXPIRATION DATE WERE CONFIRMED TO MATCH BOTH SPRING CLIPS WHICH WERE OPENED FOR THE CASE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON 17FEB2025 NO INTERVENTION WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WHEN THE DEVICE MALFUNCTIONED. THE DEVICE FAILED AT THE END OF THE CASE. NO, THE SURGEON DID NOT EXPERIENCE LOSS OF OCCLUSION DUE TO JAW SEPARATION. THE SEPARATION HAPPENED DURING THE PLANNED UNCLAMPING. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE VESSEL. THERE WAS NO RUST NOTED AFTER THE DEVICE SEPARATED. PATIENT STATUS: NO HARM INTERVENTION: NI.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22287101 ↗
Other Clip, Vascular devices
- Stealth® Spring Clip A1603Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Clip, Vascular4 reports
- Soft/Soft Spring Clip A1801Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Clip, Vascular1 report
- Latis® Spring Clip A1611Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Clip, Vascular1 report
- Stealth® Spring Clip A1604Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Clip, Vascular1 report
- Sof/Soft Spring Clip G-1200Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Clip, Vascular1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page