CD HORIZON® Spinal System G7540020Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW G7540020 SET SCREW BREAK OFF TI · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CD HORIZON Spinal System (342)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 8
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994143181), received between Feb 25, 2019 and Jun 6, 2022 — classified as 8 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Problem3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Failure to Align2
- Biocompatibility1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Pain5
- Failure of Implant3
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
- Intervertebral Disc Compression or Protrusion1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Paralysis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 6, 2022Biocompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Biocompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING PLIF. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED POSTOPERATIVE METAL ALLERGY AND THE ADDITIONAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED FOR THE REMOVAL OF DEVICE ON (B)(6) 2022. THE INITIAL OPERATION WAS PERFORMED AT IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ON (B)(6) 2014. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION ABOUT FAULTY PRODUCTS, BUT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED METAL ALLERGY SYMPTOMS THAT ARE CONSIDERED DUE TO IMPLANTED PRODUCTS. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 14600355 ↗InjuryMar 25, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDICAL SAFETY ASSESSES THE REPORTED EVENT OF ¿LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION¿ AT THE ADJACENT LEVEL AS NOT RELATED TO THE DEVICE. THERE WERE NO MALFUNCTIONS WITH THE IMPLANTED PRODUCT. THE DISC HERNIATION OCCURRED AT THE ADJACENT LEVEL.
Patient problems: Intervertebral Disc Compression or Protrusion; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Paralysis
MAUDE report 11567934 ↗InjurySep 26, 2019Migration; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION (PLF) AT L4-5-S1 DUE TO SYMPTOMS OCCURRED TO L5. POST-OP, SET SCREW LOOSENED. IT WAS ASSUMED THAT THE SET SCREW WAS LOOSENED BEFORE BONE UNION OF POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION (PLF) WAS COMPLETED. WHILE USING THE ELECTRIC KNIFE TO PERFORM THE REVISION SURGERY, SPARKS FELL. DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE SET SCREW SEVERE METALLOSIS OCCURED NEAR THE RIGHT SIDE OF S1. PATIENT SUFFERED FROM PSEUDOARTHROSIS AT L5-S1 AND THERE WERE SOME SYMPTOMS AND COMPLICATIONS TO THE LEFT LOWER LIMBS AFTER THIS SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9122134 ↗InjuryJul 5, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION AT L2-S1. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, POST-OP, A CLEAR ZONE AROUND THE SCREW ON THE RIGHT OF S1 WAS NOTICED AND THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN IN THE RIGHT LOWER LIMB AND LOWER BACK. HENCE, A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED ON (B)(6) 2019, DURING WHICH THE SET SCREW AT RIGHT OF S1 WAS FOUND LOOSENED, WHICH LED TO A PAIN IN THE LOWER LIMB. THE EXISTING IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED AGAIN AT L5-S1-ILIAC. THE PATIENT'S ISSUE HAS NOW BEEN REPORTED AS RESOLVED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8765028 ↗InjuryJul 5, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION AT L2-S1. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, POST-OP, PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN IN THE RIGHT LOWER LIMB AND LOWER BACK. HENCE, A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED ON (B)(6) 2019, DURING WHICH THE SET SCREW AT LEFT OF S1 WAS FOUND LOOSENED. THE EXISTING IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED AGAIN AT L5-S1-ILIAC. THE PATIENT'S ISSUE HAS NOW BEEN REPORTED AS RESOLVED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8764957 ↗InjuryJul 5, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION AT L2-S1. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, POST-OP, PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN IN THE RIGHT LOWER LIMB AND LOWER BACK. HENCE, A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED ON (B)(6) 2019, DURING WHICH THE SET SCREW AT LEFT OF L5 WAS FOUND LOOSENED. THE EXISTING IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED AGAIN AT L5-S1-ILIAC. THE PATIENT'S ISSUE HAS NOW BEEN REPORTED AS RESOLVED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8764922 ↗InjuryFeb 25, 2019Failure to Align; Failure to Align
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: T10 FRACTURE - THORACIC KYPHOSIS PROCEDURE USED: ARTHRODESIS LEVELS IMPLANTED: T3 - S1 IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST-OP, DUE TO BREAKAGE OF THE CONNECTORS AND RODS THAT PREVENTED FROM FUSION, THE SET SCREW THREAD DAMAGED AND AS A RESULT THE PATIENT SUFFERED WITH PAIN. T3-SACRUM ARTHRODESIS, ROD REPLACEMENT, SCREW REPLACEMENT AND NUT REPLACEMENT WERE PERFORMED AS A REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 8365231 ↗InjuryFeb 25, 2019Failure to Align; Failure to Align
PRE-OPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: T10 FRACTURE - THORACIC KYPHOSIS PROCEDURE USED: ARTHRODESIS LEVELS IMPLANTED: T3 - S1 IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST-OP, DUE TO BREAKAGE OF THE CONNECTORS AND RODS THAT PREVENTED FROM FUSION, THE SET SCREW THREAD DAMAGED AND AS A RESULT THE PATIENT SUFFERED WITH PAIN. T3-SACRUM ARTHRODESIS, ROD REPLACEMENT, SCREW REPLACEMENT AND NUT REPLACEMENT WERE PERFORMED AS A REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 8365217 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page