VERTEX® Reconstruction System 6958734PTRecalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW 6958734PT 3.5MM X 34 PT MAS · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00613994356727), received between May 3, 2023 and May 3, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (1 report).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K083071); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- Nerve Damage1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 3, 2023Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
CITATION: SHARON KA PO. TAM, PAOLO A. BOLOGNESE, ROGER W. KULA, ANDREW BRODBELT, MANSOOR FOROUGHI, MARAT AVSHALUMOV, DENMARK MUGUTSO AND ILENE RUHOY. SAFETY ANALYSIS AND COMPLICATIONS OF CONDYLAR SCREWS IN A SINGLE-SURGEON SERIES OF 250 OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSIONS. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA (2022). 164:903¿911. DOI.ORG/10.1007/S00701-021-05039-Z. EVENT SUMMARY: A RETROSPECTIVE SAFETY AND COMPLICATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSION VIA CONDYLAR SCREWS FIXATION WAS PERFORMED. THIS STUDY AIMS TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY PROFILE AND COMPLICATIONS OF CONDYLAR SCREW FIXATION FOR OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSION. A TOTAL OF 250 PATIENTS UNDERWENT OCCIPITOCERVICAL FUSIONS USING 500 CONDYLAR SCREWS BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 2012 AND SEPTEMBER 2018. TWO HUNDRED SEVENTEEN PATIENTS WERE FEMALES. THE MEAN AGE WAS 36 ± 13.4 SD, RANGING FROM 6 TO 75. 23 PATIENTS WERE BELOW 18 YEARS OF AGE (RANGING 6 TO 17). FORTY-FOUR CASES WERE REVISION SURGERIES FROM A FORMER BARPLATE CONFIGURATION. INDICATIONS FOR REVISION OPERATIONS INCLUDED PAINFUL PROFILE, METAL FATIGUE, OR BAR-PLATE BREAKDOWN, ALONE OR IN COMBINATION. ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY PATIENTS (72%) HAD A FORMAL DIAGNOSIS OR CLINICAL EVIDENCE. OF A C
Patient problems: Nerve Damage
MAUDE report 16858389 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K083071. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1826-2016 · Apr 1, 2016 · TerminatedVarious trauma and sports medicine instruments and implants. Spinal interlaminal fixation orthosis.
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.