Skip to content

VERTEX® Reconstruction System 7755278Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · PLATE 7755278 Adjustable OC · Class 2 · Implant

All models of VERTEX Reconstruction System (34)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00613994387011), received between Nov 16, 2021 and Nov 16, 2021 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 16, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA FIELD REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING PATIENT WITH PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS- CHIN ON CHEST DEFORMITY INVOLVED IN THE POSTERIOR CERVICAL FUSION. ADDITION OF OCCIPITAL PLATE AND RODS TO EXISTING IMPLANT CONSTRUCT. LEVELS IM PLANTED- OCCIPUT TO T2. IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST-OPERATIVELY, THE OCCIPITAL ROD MECHANISM "FELL APART" SHORTLY AFTER SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THEY DECIDED TO TREAT THE PATIENT WITH A HALO DEVICE RATHER THAN ANOTHER SURGERY TO REPLACE FAILED IMPLANTS. THE PATIENT EVENTUALLY HAD DIFFICULTY LOOKING STRAIGHT AHEAD, SO THEY SCHEDULED A REVISION OF THE OCCIPITAL RODS AND CORRECTION OF THE SAGITTAL DEFORMITY. THE PATIENT INCURRED A VASCULAR INJURY DURING THE REVISION ON (B)(6) 2021 AND THEY WERE UNABLE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. ON (B)(6) 2021, RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT PATIENT HAD SUFFERED A MAJOR STROKE. IT HAS ALSO BEEN REPORTED TO THAT PATIENT HAD PASSED AROUND 6PM ON (B)(6) 2021. ON 2021-OCT-27, RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT AS PER A/P X-RAY IMAGE ON (B)(6) 2017, THE HINGE OF THE ROD ON THE RIGHT WAS DISCONNECTED. ON THE LATERAL X-RAY IMAGE OF (B)(6) 2017 THE PROXIMAL EXTENSION OF THE ROD THAT CONNECTS TO TH

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 12818001 ↗

Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices

All APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page