Skip to content

CD HORIZON® Spinal System 54840007540Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW 54840007540 MAS 7.5X40 CC · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CD HORIZON Spinal System (342)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994589309), received between Sep 7, 2018 and Mar 15, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (6 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K091974); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break6

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 15, 2025Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION FOR BILATERAL LEG PAIN. LEVELS IMPLANTED: LEFT S1 PATIENT MEDICAL HISTORY: SMOKING, HYPERTENSION, CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, POLY NEROMPATHY, VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW BREAKAGE OCCURRED JUST BELOW SCREW HEAD. THE SCREW SHAFT IS STILL IMPLANTED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED FOR HARDWARE REMOVAL. IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE SCREW WAS ALREADY BROKEN OR BROKE ON REMOVAL.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 21613218 ↗
  • InjuryNov 12, 2021Break; Break

    INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING AN EVENT HAPPENED DURING USE FOR A PATIENT UNDERGONE UNKNOWN SPINAL THERAPY. THE PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS WAS MENTIONED AS SPINAL STENOSIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, 2 SCREWS WERE BROKEN POST-OPERATIVELY. PATIENT HAD A SYMPTOM OF PAIN. REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO EXPLANT THE BROKEN SCREW ON (B)(6) 2021. THERE WERE NO BROKEN FRAGMENTS OF SCREW REMAINED IN PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE OR TECHNIQUE USED DURING INITIAL SURGERY WAS CONVENTIONAL SCREW INSERTION METHOD AND THE LEVELS IMPLANTED WERE L5-S1. THE IMPLANT DATE OF REPORTED PRODUCT WAS UNKNOWN. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 12801782 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 17, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SURGERY DUE TO SPINAL INSTABILITY. INTRA-OP, UPON TRYING TO REMOVE THE SCREW IN THE S1 PEDICLE WHICH DIDN'T FUSE FROM THE PREVIOUS SURGERY, THE SCREW BROKE RIGHT UNDER THE TULIP HEAD. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9074363 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS PRE-OPERATIVELY DIAGNOSED WITH RECURRENT SPINAL STENOSIS WITH RIGHT LEG PAIN, COMPRESSION OF CAUDA EQUINA, GRADE 2 SPONDYLOLISTHESIS AT L4-L5, SEVERE SPONDYLOSIS AT L5-S1, DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS, L4-L5, GRADE 2, PRIOR LAMINECTOMY AT L5 AND UNDERWENT REVISION OF A PRIOR L4-S1 FUSION. DURING REMOVAL OF THE IMPLANTED INSTRUMENTS, WHEN REMOVING THE SCREW, THE SHAFT OF THE SCREW COMPLETELY FRACTURED IN HALF DIRECTLY UNDER THE TULIP HEAD. IT WAS THEN LEFT WITH THE THREADED PORTION OF THE SCREW STILL INSIDE OF THE PATIENT AND THE TULIP HEAD WAS DETACHED. THE THREADED PORTION OF THE RIGHT L4 SCREW AND THE THREADED PORTION OF BOTH L5 SCREWS REMAIN INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. INSTRUMENTS WERE FOUND BROKEN. THE SCREW FRACTURES FIRST OCCURRED UPON REMOVING THE RIGHT L4 SCREW. THEN AFTER THAT FRACTURED, THERE WAS AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE BROKEN SCREWS. 1-2 ADDITIONAL OPERATING HOURS ADDED TO THE SURGERY TIME.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7854559 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS PRE-OPERATIVELY DIAGNOSED WITH RECURRENT SPINAL STENOSIS WITH RIGHT LEG PAIN, COMPRESSION OF CAUDA EQUINA, GRADE 2 SPONDYLOLISTHESIS AT L4-L5, SEVERE SPONDYLOSIS AT L5-S1, DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS, L4-L5, GRADE 2, PRIOR LAMINECTOMY AT L5 AND UNDERWENT REVISION OF A PRIOR L4-S1 FUSION. DURING REMOVAL OF THE IMPLANTED INSTRUMENTS, WHEN REMOVING THE SCREW, THE SHAFT OF THE SCREW COMPLETELY FRACTURED IN HALF DIRECTLY UNDER THE TULIP HEAD.IT WAS THEN LEFT WITH THE THREADED PORTION OF THE SCREW STILL INSIDE OF THE PATIENT AND THE TULIP HEAD WAS DETACHED. THE THREADED PORTION OF THE RIGHT L4 SCREW AND THE THREADED PORTION OF BOTH L5 SCREWS REMAIN INSIDE OF THE PATIENT.INSTRUMENTS WERE FOUND BROKEN. THE SCREW FRACTURES FIRST OCCURRED UPON REMOVING THE RIGHT L4 SCREW. THEN AFTER THAT FRACTURED, THERE WAS AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE BROKEN SCREWS. 1-2 ADDITIONAL OPERATING HOURS ADDED TO THE SURGERY TIME.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7854557 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 7, 2018Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS PRE-OPERATIVELY DIAGNOSED WITH RECURRENT SPINAL STENOSIS WITH RIGHT LEG PAIN, COMPRESSION OF CAUDA EQUINA, GRADE 2 SPONDYLOLISTHESIS AT L4-L5, SEVERE SPONDYLOSIS AT L5-S1, DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS, L4-L5, GRADE 2, PRIOR LAMINECTOMY AT L5 AND UNDERWENT REVISION OF A PRIOR L4-S1 FUSION. DURING REMOVAL OF THE IMPLANTED INSTRUMENTS, WHEN REMOVING THE SCREW, THE SHAFT OF THE SCREW COMPLETELY FRACTURED IN HALF DIRECTLY UNDER THE TULIP HEAD. IT WAS THEN LEFT WITH THE THREADED PORTION OF THE SCREW STILL INSIDE OF THE PATIENT AND THE TULIP HEAD WAS DETACHED. THE THREADED PORTION OF THE RIGHT L4 SCREW AND THE THREADED PORTION OF BOTH L5 SCREWS REMAIN INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. INSTRUMENTS WERE FOUND BROKEN. THE SCREW FRACTURES FIRST OCCURRED UPON REMOVING THE RIGHT L4 SCREW. THEN AFTER THAT FRACTURED, THERE WAS AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE BROKEN SCREWS. 1-2 ADDITIONAL OPERATING HOURS ADDED TO THE SURGERY TIME.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7854551 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K091974. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2876-2011 · Jun 28, 2011 · Terminated
    CD HORIZON (R) SOLERA (TM) FAS, REF 54410006035, pedicle screw, Rx only, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, 1800 Pyramid Place, Memphis, TN 38132 Intended to help provide immobilizatio

Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices

All APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page