Skip to content

Contegra® 200H14 (UDI 00613994600271)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CNDT 200H14 CONTEGRA UNSUPP HDE GBR1-PS · Class f · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994600271), received between May 4, 2017 and Mar 5, 2026 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (7 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information7
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • No Information6
  • Pulmonary Valve Stenosis3
  • High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Pulmonary Insufficiency1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT 10 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 14MM PULMONARY VALVE CONDUIT IMPLANTED IN RIGHT VENTRICLE-PULMONARY ARTERY (RV-PA) POSITION AND IMPLANTED IN A THEN 9 MONTHS OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 20MM PULMONARY VALVE CONDUIT IN THE SAME IMPLANT POSITION. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24520315 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 14 MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT IN A (B)(6) MONTHS OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, A 18 MM TRANSCATHETER PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE (TPBV) WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10835764 ↗
  • InjuryJun 3, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 14MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT IN A (B)(6) MONTH OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 18MM CONDUIT OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10116271 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 4 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 14MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT IN A (B)(6) YEAR OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, A TRANSCATHETER PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE (TPBV) WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension; No Information; Pulmonary Insufficiency; Pulmonary Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 9758071 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 10 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 14MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 16MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 9321714 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 5 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 14MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT IN A 7 MONTH OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, THE CONDUIT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 20MM VALVED CONDUIT OF A DIFFERENT MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8728019 ↗
  • InjurySep 27, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THREE YEARS AND THREE MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 14MM PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVED CONDUIT, ECHOCARDIOGRAM REVEALED A GRADIENT OF 5-7 MMHG. NO INTERVENTIONS WERE PERFORMED AT THAT TIME. SIX YEARS AND SIX MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS VALVED CONDUIT, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE IN VALVE DUE TO A GRADIENT OF 30MMHG, MILD REGURGITATION AND MILD STENOSIS OF THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE CONDUIT. THE RIGHT VENTRICLE WAS NOTED TO BE DILATED AND HYPERTENSIVE, WITH MILDLY DEPRESSED FUNCTION AT THIS TIME. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pulmonary Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 7917147 ↗
  • InjuryMay 4, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT FIVE YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 14MM BIOPROSTHETIC PULMONIC VALVED CONDUIT IN A PEDIATRIC PATIENT, THIS VALVE WAS REPLACED WITH A 16MM PULMONIC VALVED CONDUIT. NO FAILURE MECHANISM AND NO OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information; Pulmonary Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 6544525 ↗

Other pulmonic valved conduit devices

All pulmonic valved conduit devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page