Skip to content

Duran AnCore® 620RG33 (UDI 00613994759009)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · RING 620RG33 DURAN ANCORE 10L MEXICO · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Duran AnCore (42)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00613994759009), received between Dec 2, 2016 and Jun 21, 2023 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information6
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Information5
  • Insufficient Information2
  • Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 21, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 33MM AORTIC ANNULOPLASTY RING, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17172919 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 8 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 33MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 31MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 12647659 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 33 MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 31 MM MECHANICAL VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10593123 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 33 MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 31 MM BIOPROSTHETIC MITRAL VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10462933 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, THE RING WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN DEVICE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8692014 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING WAS IMPLANTED AND EXPLANTED ON THE SAME DAY FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH A BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. NO OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6809965 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2016Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT ONE YEAR AND EIGHT MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. NO FAILURE MECHANISM WAS PROVIDED. NO OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6142555 ↗

Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices

All RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page