Skip to content

miniMark Dental Implant System 09270202Recalls & reported problems

Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · MINI LOCATOR 2.3X10 2MM CUFF IMPLANT TI 6AL 4V ELI · Class 2 · Implant

All models of miniMark Dental Implant System (28)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950002757), received between Jan 4, 2019 and Apr 22, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate2
  • Osseointegration Problem2

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Pain2
  • Numbness1
  • Swelling1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 22, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY, PAIN, NUMBNESS, BLEEDING , SWELLING AND FISTULA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain

    MAUDE report 11711792 ↗
  • InjuryJan 4, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    PAIN, SWELLING, MOBILITY AND PERI-IMPLANTITIS WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Swelling

    MAUDE report 8216498 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page