miniMark Dental Implant SystemRecalls & reported problems across all models
Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · 28 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 91
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 91
- Recalls
- 0
We found 28 models of miniMark Dental Implant System by Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 91 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Nov 24, 2015 and Nov 30, 2023 — classified as 91 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (72 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported miniMark Dental Implant System problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem72
- Failure to Osseointegrate40
- Insufficient Device Problem Information11
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
- Fracture2
- Loss of Osseointegration2
- Patient Device Interaction Problem2
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant90
- Pain32
- Swelling10
- Fistula6
- Numbness6
- Unspecified Infection4
- No Information1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
miniMark Dental Implant System models
28 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- miniMark Dental Implant System 09270702IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM10 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10291020IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM10 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 09270703IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM8 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10231020IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM8 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10290840IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM7 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10291040IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM5 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 09270704IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM4 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 09270705IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM4 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10231520IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM4 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10231040IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM3 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10290840IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM3 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10321005IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM3 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10321320IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM3 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 09270202IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM2 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10231120IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM2 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10231320IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM2 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 11231100IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM2 reports
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10290820IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10291120IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10321020Implant, Endosseous, Root-Form1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10321040IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10321105IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10321120IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10321305IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 10321520IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 11231000IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 11321005IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
- miniMark Dental Implant System 11321520IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM1 report
Recent miniMark Dental Implant System adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 30, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
MOBILITY DISCOVERED AFTER 1 MONTH & IMPLANT REMOVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18242893 ↗InjurySep 7, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
InjuryMay 26, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Osseointegration Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
InjuryMay 25, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
AT THE TIME OF CROWN PLACEMENT, IT WAS HURTING THE PATIENT AND SOME MOBILITY NOTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 17001994 ↗InjuryAug 27, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INFECTION WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS DIABETES.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12378243 ↗InjuryAug 6, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12290882 ↗InjuryAug 6, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED AFTER PATIENT HAD ACCIDENT (FELL AND HIT MOUTH). BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12290805 ↗InjuryJul 22, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1 TO 5 YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12211623 ↗InjuryJul 22, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE I. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1 TO 5 YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12211597 ↗InjuryApr 22, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY, PAIN, NUMBNESS, BLEEDING , SWELLING AND FISTULA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain
MAUDE report 11711792 ↗InjuryNov 3, 2020Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY/BONE QUANTITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10777419 ↗InjuryAug 20, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection
MOBILITY, PERI-IMPLANTITIS AND POOR ORAL HYGIENE WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1 TO 5 YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10430249 ↗InjuryApr 24, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MOBILITY AND ASYMPTOMATIC WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION 1 TO 5 YEARS AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9995498 ↗InjuryAug 1, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN, SWELLING AND PERI-IMPLANTITIS WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. PATIENT HAS A BLOOD CLOTTING DISORDER.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 8849816 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND MILD INFLAMMATION WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8792501 ↗
Other Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. products
All Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page