Skip to content

miniMark Dental Implant System 10291020Recalls & reported problems

Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · miniMARK 2.9X10MM W/2MM CUFF LOCATOR IMPLANT TI 6AL 4V ELI · Class 2 · Implant

All models of miniMark Dental Implant System (28)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950003143), received between Apr 8, 2016 and Nov 30, 2023 — classified as 10 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (9 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem9
  • Failure to Osseointegrate6

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant10
  • Pain4
  • Fistula1
  • Numbness1
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
  • Swelling1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 30, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    MOBILITY DISCOVERED AFTER 1 MONTH & IMPLANT REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 18242893 ↗
  • InjuryJul 16, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY AND MILD INFLAMMATION WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 8792499 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    PERI-IMPLANTITIS, FISTULA, ASINTOMATICA, PAIN, BLEEDING AND NUMBNESS WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain

    MAUDE report 8707998 ↗
  • InjuryJun 18, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    NUMBNESS, PAIN, BLEEDING, SWELLING, FISTULA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Pain; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 8707996 ↗
  • InjuryJan 10, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    INFECTION, MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 8235022 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    PAIN, SWELLING, MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Swelling

    MAUDE report 7817774 ↗
  • InjuryOct 24, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1-3 MONTHS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. PATIENT HAS PERI-IMPLANTIS.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 6052069 ↗
  • InjuryJun 1, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE RESTORATION. IT WAS REPORTED INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 5692868 ↗
  • InjuryJun 1, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE RESTORATION. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS NOT LONG ENOUGH.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 5692858 ↗
  • InjuryApr 8, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PAIN AND MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED BUT OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 5564140 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page