miniMark Dental Implant System 10291020Recalls & reported problems
Ace Surgical Supply CO., Inc. · miniMARK 2.9X10MM W/2MM CUFF LOCATOR IMPLANT TI 6AL 4V ELI · Class 2 · Implant
All models of miniMark Dental Implant System (28)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00614950003143), received between Apr 8, 2016 and Nov 30, 2023 — classified as 10 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (9 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Osseointegration Problem9
- Failure to Osseointegrate6
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant10
- Pain4
- Fistula1
- Numbness1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
- Swelling1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 30, 2023Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
MOBILITY DISCOVERED AFTER 1 MONTH & IMPLANT REMOVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18242893 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY AND MILD INFLAMMATION WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 8792499 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PERI-IMPLANTITIS, FISTULA, ASINTOMATICA, PAIN, BLEEDING AND NUMBNESS WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Numbness; Pain
MAUDE report 8707998 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
NUMBNESS, PAIN, BLEEDING, SWELLING, FISTULA WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE III. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS UP TO 1 YEAR AFTER PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Fistula; Pain; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 8707996 ↗InjuryJan 10, 2019Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
INFECTION, MOBILITY AND PAIN WERE REPORTED. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE WAS TYPE II. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 8235022 ↗InjuryAug 27, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN, SWELLING, MOBILITY WERE REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT TIME OF IMPLANT FAILURE TYPE II. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED. OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain; Swelling
MAUDE report 7817774 ↗InjuryOct 24, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. BONE QUALITY AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT WAS TYPE IV. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS 1-3 MONTHS BEFORE PROSTHETIC RESTORATION. PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. PATIENT HAS PERI-IMPLANTIS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6052069 ↗InjuryJun 1, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE RESTORATION. IT WAS REPORTED INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5692868 ↗InjuryJun 1, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
PRIMARY STABILITY AND OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS ACHIEVED. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS NOT PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. TIME OF LOSS IN RELATION TO THE IMPLANTATION WAS BEFORE RESTORATION. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS NOT LONG ENOUGH.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5692858 ↗InjuryApr 8, 2016Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
PAIN AND MOBILITY WAS REPORTED. PRIMARY STABILITY WAS ACHIEVED BUT OSSEOINTEGRATION WAS NOT. AUGMENTATION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT THE TIME OF SURGERY. INADEQUATE BONE QUALITY.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 5564140 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page