Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626525Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · IMPLANT G6626525 NP LORDO 5MMX15MMX12MM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Divergence Anterior Cervical Fusion System (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Medtronic Divergence anterior cervical fusion device has 76 adverse event reports, all malfunctions, with no deaths or injuries. Reports describe the cage breaking or cracking during insertion or screwing; no patient symptoms or injuries were reported. Reports over the last 12 months fell from 18 to 2. There are no recalls naming this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 75
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 75 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169337558), received between Apr 19, 2017 and Jan 20, 2026 — classified as 75 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (60 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break60
- Crack7
- Fracture4
- Material Deformation2
- Product Quality Problem2
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions46
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient30
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 75 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 20, 2026Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION AT C5/6/7. PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS OF PATIENT WAS CERVICAL HERNIA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, A CRACK DEVELOPED AND THE CAGE BROKE DURING INSERTION WITH THE FREE-HAND INSERTER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24115062 ↗MalfunctionOct 30, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, DISTRIBUTOR) REGARDING AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED DURING A C5-C6 ACDF PROCEDURE IN A PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN CAGE DIVERGENCE WAS INSERTED INTO THE INSERTER AND KNOCKED WITH HAMMER, IT BROKE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23425151 ↗MalfunctionJul 25, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING DISCECTOMY PROC EDURE FOR ACUTE CERVICAL PAIN IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE BROKE WHILE A SCREW WAS BEING INSERTED. THE CAGE WAS EXPLANTED AND A DIFFERENT CAGE WAS IMPLANTED AT ONE CERVICAL LEVEL. THERE WAS A DELAY OF LESS THAN 60 MINUTES IN OVERALL PROCEDURE TIME AND THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22607380 ↗MalfunctionJul 11, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE WAS BROKEN WHEN TRYING TO INSERT SCREWS. THERE WERE NO BROKEN FRAGMENTS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT AND NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS OR SYMPTOMS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE IS NO ALLEGATION OR MALFUNCTION ASSOCIATED WITH SCREW. THE PROCEDURE INVOLVED IN THE EVENT IS ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION (ACDF) AND PRE-OP DIAGNOSIS IS CERVICAL PAIN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22479559 ↗MalfunctionJun 25, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FUSION DEVICE WAS SCREWED IN DURING THE OPERATION, IT BROKE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22326025 ↗MalfunctionJun 10, 2025Break; Product Quality Problem; Break; Product Quality Problem
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY USING SELF-STABILIZING CERVICAL FUSION FIXATION SYSTEM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS FRACTURED WHILE SCREWING. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS OR SYMPTOMS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE ARE NO BROKEN FRAGMENTS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT AS THE EVENT OCCURRED DURING IMPLANTATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22174503 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED DURING A C6/7 SPINAL FUSION PROCEDURE IN A PATIENT DIAGNOSED WITH DROPPED HEAD SYNDROME. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE PRODUCT WAS INSERTED ON C6/7, DAMAGE WAS CONFIRMED AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED; AFTER THE SECOND PRODUCT WAS INSERTED, DAMAGE TO THE CAGE WAS CONFIRMED AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AGAIN. THERE WAS A DELAY OF LESS THAN 60 MINS. THERE ARE NO IMPLANT DEBRIS LEFT IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22141307 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED DURING A C6/7 SPINAL FUSION PROCEDURE IN A PATIENT DIAGNOSED WITH DROPPED HEAD SYNDROME. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE PRODUCT WAS INSERTED ON C6/7, DAMAGE WAS CONFIRMED AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED; AFTER THE SECOND PRODUCT WAS INSERTED, DAMAGE TO THE CAGE WAS CONFIRMED AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AGAIN. THERE WAS A DELAY OF LESS THAN 60 MINS. THERE ARE NO IMPLANT DEBRIS LEFT IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22141246 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2025Fracture; Product Quality Problem; Fracture; Product Quality Problem
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, DISTRIBUTOR) REGARDING A CAGE USED ON PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, WHEN THE SURGEON WAS INSERTING THE INTERVERTEBRAL DISC FOR SPINAL FUSION, IMPLANT IMMEDIATELY FRACTURED. THIS ISSUE IS RELATED PRODUCT QUALITY. THERE WAS NO DELAY REPORTED. UPON DISCOVERING THAT THE INTERVERTEBRAL DISC IMPLANT FRACTURED DURING THE PROCEDURE, A REPLACEMENT IMPLANT WAS USED TO ENSURE THE SURGERY COULD PROCEED AS PLANNED. LEVEL IMPLANTED WAS C3-C4. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22032757 ↗MalfunctionMay 2, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING C4-C5 ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION (ACDF). IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE WAS BROKEN DURING THE INSERTION. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21949016 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2025Fracture; Fracture
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL VIA MANUFACTURING REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT UNDERGOING FOR CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT FRACTURE OF IMPLANTED FUSION DEVICE DURING OPERATION. EXPLANT COMPLETED. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS RELATED TO THIS EVENT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED/ANTICIPATED DUE TO THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE REP THAT, CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS WAS THE PRE OP DIAGNOSIS FOR THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21687304 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED DURING AN ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHROSIS PROCEDURE IN A PATIENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE BROKE DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN IT WAS IMPACTED. THEY WERE USING THE HAND LOCK SPECIFICALLY FOR THE CAGE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED BECAUSE AS SOON AS THE CAGE WAS IMPACTED IT WAS OBSERVED THAT IT HAD BROKEN, SO THE CAGE WAS IMMEDIATELY REPLACED WITH ANOTHER ONE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21591616 ↗MalfunctionMar 2, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY FOR CERVICAL HERNIA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, THE CAGE WAS BROKEN WHEN IT WAS DRIVEN ADDITIONALLY USING THE TRIAL AS AN IMPACTOR. THE PROCEDURE OR TECHNIQUE PERFORMED WAS ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION AND THE LEVELS PLANNED WERE C6/C7. THERE WAS A DELAY OF LESS THAN 60 MINUTES REPORTED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. NO FRAGMENT OF BROKEN CAGE LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT BODY. NO ADDITIONAL TREATMENT OR SURGERY PERFORMED AS A RESULT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21500897 ↗MalfunctionFeb 25, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING FUSION FOR CERVICAL DISC HERNIATION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE FRAGMENTED DURING IMPLANTATION AND WAS TAKEN OUT ON THE SPOT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21456981 ↗MalfunctionFeb 23, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A USER FACILITY VIA A USER REPORT REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING C2-C6 DECOMPRESSION AND FUSION POSTERIOR OF THE CERVICAL SPINE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILE BEING TAMPED INTO THE INTERBODY SPACE, THE CAGE CRACKED IN TWO PLACES. THE CAGE WAS CAREFULLY REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21442398 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, DISTRIBUTOR) REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING UNKNOWN SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR WAS IMPLANTING THE CAGE WITH THE CORRECT GUIDE, AFTER PLACING THE CAGE AND REMOVING THE GUIDE, THE DOCTOR DECIDED TO ADJUST THE CAGE, HOWEVER, WITHOUT THE GUIDE, IT WAS DIFFICULT AND AFTER REMOVING THE GUIDE, THERE WAS NO WAY TO GET IT BACK. THEREFORE, THE DOCTOR TRIED TO IMPACT THE CAGE WITH AN IMPROVISED INSTRUMENT, CAUSING THE CAGE TO BREAK AND HAVING TO REPLACE IT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21418766 ↗MalfunctionFeb 12, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, DISTRIBUTOR) REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING ANTERIOR CERVICAL FIXATION PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE TIME OF PLACING THE DEVICE IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE WAS A PATIENT INVOLVED. THE PATIENT WAS HAVING THE IMPLANT PLACED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21362289 ↗MalfunctionJan 30, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED DURING A C4-C5 ACDF PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANTATION OF THE CAGE BROKE. THE DEVICE WAS NEVER IMPLANTED. NO PATIENT INJURY / COMPLICATION REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21272290 ↗MalfunctionNov 1, 2024Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM DISTRIBUTOR VIA HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGE WAS BROKEN DURING PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS REPORTED AND NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20587862 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2024Break; Break
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION. NO FRAGMENT OF THE IMPLANT REMAINING IN THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19545225 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2024Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING SPINAL THERAPY FOR UNKNOWN INDICATION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SURGEON PERFORMED A COMBINED ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR CERVICAL FRACTURE AND DISLOCATION REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION. AFTER POSTERIOR SCREW ROD FIXATION WAS PERFORMED FIRST, ANTERIOR CERVICAL PRODUCT STAND ALONE WAS USED IN THE ANTERIOR APPROACH. WHEN HOLDING THE FUSION CAGE WITH A HOLDER TOOL AND INSERTING IT INTO THE INTERVERTEBRAL SPACE, TAP THE FUSION CAGE TOWARD THE POSTERIOR EDGE OF THE VERTEBRAL BODY TO INSERT. A BREAK OCCURRED. AFTER REPLACING THE FUSION CAGE, IT BROKE AGAIN WHEN THE SURGEON HIT IT. WHEN REPLACING THE THIRD FUSION CAGE, IT WAS IMPLANTED NORMALLY AND COMPLETED THE SURGERY. THIS SURGERY CAUSED TWO SCREWS TO DEFORM AND TWO CAGES TO BREAK. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19527106 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2024Crack; Crack
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT IMPLANTED WITH A CAGE IN AN ACDF FOR CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON FOUND THAT THE FUSION CAGE WAS CRACKED WHEN IMPLANTING. THE CRACKED FUSION CAGE COULD NO LONGER BE USED. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO IMPLANT THE CAGE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THE CAGE WAS NOT CRACKED WHEN THE PRODUCT WAS OPENED FROM THE BOX FOR THE FIRST TIME. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED/ ANTICIPATED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19482335 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHODESIS FOR AN CERVICAL HERNIA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGES HAD THEIR STRUCTURE DAMAGED WHEN THEY WERE INSERTED AND IMPACTED ON THE PATIENT. TWO OF THEM STILL ARE IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19475060 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2024Material Deformation; Material Deformation
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING ANTERIOR CERVICAL ARTHODESIS FOR AN CERVICAL HERNIA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CAGES HAD THEIR STRUCTURE DAMAGED WHEN THEY WERE INSERTED AND IMPACTED ON THE PATIENT. TWO OF THEM STILL ARE IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19475052 ↗MalfunctionDec 26, 2023Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (HEALTHCARE PROVIDER, DISTRIBUTOR) REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING CAGE CERVICAL DIVERGENCE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR PLACED THE CAGE WITH THE GUIDE, AND THEN TRIED TO ALIGN IT BY IMPACTING THE CAGE IN AN IMPROVISED WAY, THUS BREAKING IT. THERE WERE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE PATIENT. THE BROKEN CAGE WAS REMOVED AND A NEW ONE WAS PLACED IN PLACE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18395791 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices
- NA 03.617.902Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical103 reports
- NA 03.617.900Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical77 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626526Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical49 reports
- NA 03.617.905Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical29 reports
- NA 03.617.904Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical27 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626746Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical21 reports
- NA 03.647.972Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical17 reports
- AVS Anchor-C 48335310Stryker Corporation · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical15 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page