Skip to content

N/A 1883070BLDRecalls & reported problems

Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR 1883070BLD DIAMOND 70DG 3MM 13CM 30K · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169434622), received between Feb 28, 2022 and Aug 4, 2023 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Vibration1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2023Vibration; Vibration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTRA-OPERATIVE DURING THE FESS PROCEDURE THE BLADE SPUN IN THE MICRODEBRIDER INSTEAD OF STAYING LOCKED IN PLACE. THE DEVICE CHECKED FOR VIBRATION/WOBBLE PRIOR TO USE. THE VIBRATING DEVICE WAS USED ON THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A BACKUP PRODUCT. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17459542 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2023Break; Break

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE BUR BROKE WHILE IN USE AND SURGEON FELT SOMETHING POP WHILE USING IT. THE HEAD OF THE BUR IS INTACT AND NO FRAGMENTS/PIECES DETACHED FROM THE BROKEN DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16493754 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2022Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PRE-OP BLADE/BUR NOT SEATING AND THE BUR WAS STUCK. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED. ON FOLLOW-UP, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HANDPIECE WAS A DEMO DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS ONLY BORROWED TO THE CUSTOMER AS BACKUP DEVICE. SERVICE AND REPAIR FOUND THAT THERE WAS PIECE OF BUR IN THE COLLET. ON FURTHER FOLLOW-UP IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BUR WAS BROKEN WHILE USED ON PATIENT AND THE OPERATOR COULDN¿T REMOVE THE BUR AFTER THE ACCIDENT. IT¿S DIFFICULT TO EVALUATE BUT PROBABLY THE REAR END. THE PART THAT¿S INSIDE THE HANDPIECE. NO FRAGMENTS THAT CAME OFF OR GOT DETACHED FROM THE BROKEN DEVICE. NO FRAGMENT GET IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13616823 ↗

Other BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices

All BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page