Skip to content

N/A 9735018Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · SUCTION 9735018 MALLEABLE BALL TIP 9-FR · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169443532), received between Nov 14, 2017 and Jan 26, 2018 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Communication or Transmission Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Communication or Transmission Problem1
  • Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
  • Device Stops Intermittently1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 26, 2018Communication or Transmission Problem; Material Integrity Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    A SITE REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING PITUITARY LUMPECTOMY, THE MALLEABLE SUCTION HAD RECOGNITION FAILURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE USE OF BACK UP INSTRUMENT. THERE WAS NO DELAY TO PROCEDURE. NO IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7222045 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 14, 2017Device Stops Intermittently; Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Device Stops Intermittently; Device Operates Differently Than Expected

    A MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT DURING TRANSNASAL ENDOSCOPIC PITUITARY SURGERY, THE MALLEABLE SUCTION WAS SUCCESSFULLY REGISTERED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PROCEDURE HOWEVER DURING THE CASE THE SUCTION HAD RECOGNITION FAILURE. A DIFFERENT MALLEABLE SUCTION WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO DELAY TO PROCEDURE. NO IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7031200 ↗

Other Ear, Nose, and Throat Stereotaxic Instrument devices

All Ear, Nose, and Throat Stereotaxic Instrument devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page