Skip to content

HANCOCK II ULTRA® T505U225 (UDI 00643169534100)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · VLV T505U225 HKII AORULT CII NNA US TEMP · Class 3 · Implant

All models of HANCOCK II ULTRA (19)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169534100), received between Oct 18, 2017 and Aug 23, 2026 — classified as 9 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (7 reports).

4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P980043); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information7
  • Device Stenosis1
  • Gradient Increase1
  • Intravalvular regurgitation1
  • Perivalvular Leak1

Patient problems

  • Aortic Insufficiency3
  • Insufficient Information3
  • Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation2
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis2
  • No Information2
  • Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation1
  • Pulmonary Valve Stenosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 23, 2026Intravalvular regurgitation

    It was reported that 10 years and 6 months post implant of this 25mm aortic bioprosthetic valve, the patient is being evaluated for a transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement. The reason for evaluation was reported as aortic insufficiency. No intervention or adverse patient effects were reported.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 50397596 ↗
  • InjuryDec 10, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20895229 ↗
  • InjuryMar 20, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 7 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A  VALVE OF THE SAME SIZE AND MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 18940443 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2023Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 7 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE IMPLANTED IN A THEN 9 YEAR OLD PEDIATRIC PATIENT, A TRANSCATHETER PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE (TPBV) WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Pulmonary Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 17104861 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 5 YEARS AND 1 MONTH POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE DUE TO SEVERE AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 11797260 ↗
  • InjuryOct 9, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 4 YEARS 1 MONTH POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS REPLACED WITH A 26MM TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE DUE TO MODERATE AORTIC STENOSIS AND MODERATE TO SEVERE AORTIC INSUFFICIENCY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Insufficiency; Aortic Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 9171874 ↗
  • InjuryMay 10, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS BIOPROSTHETIC AORTIC VALVE, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE DUE TO INSUFFICIENCY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Insufficiency

    MAUDE report 8601078 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2018Perivalvular Leak; Perivalvular Leak

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT TWO DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25 MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 23 MM AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE DUE TO SEVERE PARAVALVULAR LEAK (PVL). THE SURGEON STATED THERE WAS NO MALFUNCTION OF THE BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE ITSELF. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7533985 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2017Gradient Increase; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Gradient Increase; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE PATIENT WAS BEING CONSIDERED FOR VALVE REPLACEMENT. SUBSEQUENTLY 23 DAYS LATER, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN ATTEMPTED REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE WITH A TRANSCATHETER VALVE (VALVE-IN-VALVE). THE ATTEMPTED VALVE-IN-VALVE IMPLANT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL DUE TO PATIENT ANATOMY AND THIS DEVICE REMAINS IMPLANTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Aortic Insufficiency; No Information

    MAUDE report 6958809 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P980043. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1883-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Hancock II T510 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF T510C27 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1882-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Hancock II T510 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF T505U227 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1884-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Hancock II T510 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF T510C27 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1226-2009 · Jan 26, 2009 · Terminated
    Hancock II Bioprostheses with Cinch, Heart Valve, Model # T505 & T510; Catalog #s T505C2501, T505C2101, T505U25ID , T505C2301, T505C2301, T505C2501, T505C2101, T510C29ID, T510C25ID

Other replacement Heart-valve devices

All replacement Heart-valve devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page