Skip to content

HANCOCK® II T510C25 (UDI 00643169594395)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · VLV T510C25 HKII MIT CINCH US PEEK · Class 3 · Implant

All models of HANCOCK II (43)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169594395), received between Feb 15, 2018 and Jul 5, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size” (1 report).

4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P980043); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Bradycardia1
  • Heart Block1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Obstruction/Occlusion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 5, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT ON THE SAME DAY POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE AND 32MM TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY BAND, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS COMPLETE HEART BLOCK (CHB). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Heart Block

    MAUDE report 19678917 ↗
  • InjurySep 23, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 26MM MITRAL MECHANICAL VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12519015 ↗
  • InjuryJul 24, 2020Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE, THE STENT POSTS IMPEDED THE LEFT VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT (LVOT) CAUSING TURBULENT FLOW VISIBLE ON ECHO AFTER COMING OFF BYPASS. THE AORTIC GRADIENT WAS TAKEN TO VALIDATE LVOT OBSTRUCTION AND THE GRADIENT WAS 20MMHG, FROM A BASELINE OF 4MMHG. THE PATIENT WAS PUT BACK ON BYPASS AND THE 25MM VALVE WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC MITRAL VALVE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Obstruction/Occlusion

    MAUDE report 10320058 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 15, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION FROM THE PATIENT'S DAUGHTER THAT 2 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE A NON-MEDTRONIC PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR PERMANENT PACEMAKER IMPLANT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.  NOTE: A NON-MEDTRONIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE WAS IMPLANTED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Bradycardia

    MAUDE report 7274523 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P980043. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1882-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Hancock II T510 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF T505U227 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1884-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Hancock II T510 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF T510C27 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1883-2019 · May 21, 2019 · Terminated
    Hancock II T510 Bioprosthesis, Mitral, REF T510C27 - Product Usage: Replacement of malfunctioning native or prosthetic aortic and/or mitral valves.
  • Z-1226-2009 · Jan 26, 2009 · Terminated
    Hancock II Bioprostheses with Cinch, Heart Valve, Model # T505 & T510; Catalog #s T505C2501, T505C2101, T505U25ID , T505C2301, T505C2301, T505C2501, T505C2101, T510C29ID, T510C25ID

Other replacement Heart-valve devices

All replacement Heart-valve devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page