Skip to content

Contegra® 200SH18 (UDI 00643169616868)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CNDT 200SH18 CONTEGRA SUPP HDE · Class f · Implant

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169616868), received between Aug 23, 2017 and Mar 24, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Gradient Increase” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Gradient Increase4
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size2
  • Intravalvular regurgitation2
  • Calcified1
  • Device Stenosis1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation2
  • Pulmonary Valve Stenosis2
  • Congenital Defect/Deformity1
  • Death1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 24, 2026Gradient Increase; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS DUE TO OUTGROWTH OF THE ORIGINAL CONDUIT. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Pulmonary Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 24672704 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2024Calcified; Gradient Increase; Intravalvular regurgitation; Calcified; Gradient Increase; Intravalvular regurgitation

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH "FREE PULMONARY REGURGITATION AND A GRADIENT OF 29MMHG DUE TO WHAT LOOKED TO BE A CALCIFIED FROZEN LEAFLET". IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BALLOON VALVULOPLASTY WAS PERFORMED USING HIGH PRESSURE ATLAS BALLOONS. TWO STENTS WERE PLACED THEN POST DILATED WITH A 20MM ATLAS, A TRANSCATHETER PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE (TPBV) WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation

    MAUDE report 20676307 ↗
  • InjuryMay 5, 2021Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 18MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 16MM CONDUIT OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11776158 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2017Gradient Increase; Gradient Increase

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 3 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT, A TRANSCATHETER PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE (TPBV) WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-VALVE DUE TO STENOSIS AND HIGH GRADIENTS OF THE VALVED CONDUIT. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pulmonary Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 7070570 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2017Gradient Increase; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Gradient Increase; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 DAYS POST IMPLANT OF THIS PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT, THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED DUE TO UNKNOWN REASONS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Congenital Defect/Deformity; Death; No Information

    MAUDE report 6814600 ↗

Other pulmonic valved conduit devices

All pulmonic valved conduit devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.