Skip to content

CD HORIZON® SOLERA® VOYAGER™ Spinal System 55750046540Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW 55750046540 ST 5/6 SV ATS 6.5X40 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CD HORIZON SOLERA VOYAGER Spinal System (60)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169749009), received between Nov 14, 2022 and Jan 9, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • No Apparent Adverse Event2
  • Migration1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Unspecified Nervous System Problem1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2026No Apparent Adverse Event

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING REVISION SURGERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO NON-FUSION AT L5/S. DURING THE REVISION, CAGE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE AND FIXATED THE EXTENSION TO THE L4 - S2AI. THE SET SCREW WAS REMOVED, AND WHEN DISTRACTION WAS APPLIED BETWEEN THE SCREW BEFORE IT WAS REMOVED, THE SET SCREW WHICH WAS ATTACHED TO THE 7.5 X 40 SCREW HEAD ON BOTH SIDES WHERE THE SCREW HEAD MOVES, WAS NOT COMPLETELY LOCKED EVEN THOUGH IT WAS PROPERLY SCREWED. INITIAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025, L5/S TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24017603 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2026No Apparent Adverse Event

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT HAVING REVISION SURGERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT, REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO NON FUSION AT L5/S. DURING THE REVISION, CAGE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE, AND FIXATED THE EXTENSION TO THE L4 - S2AI. THE SET SCREW WAS REMOVED, AND WHEN DISTRACTION WAS APPLIED BETWEEN THE SCREW BEFORE IT WAS REMOVED, THE SET SCREW WHICH WAS ATTACHED TO THE 7.5 X 40 SCREW HEAD ON BOTH SIDES WHERE THE SCREW HEAD MOVES, WAS NOT COMPLETELY LOCKED EVEN THOUGH IT WAS PROPERLY SCREWED. INITIAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025, L5/S TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24017477 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2022Use of Device Problem; Migration; Use of Device Problem; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER THE PROCEDURE THE SCREWS WERE DEVIATED. THERE IS A POSSIBILITY OF L5 ROOT SYMPTOMS AFTER SURGERY AND PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION TO FIX AGAIN THROUGH REVISION SURGERY. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS OR SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT ALL THE REPORTED SCREWS WERE DEVIATED AFTER INITIAL SURGERY AND WERE EXPLANTED IN THE REVISION SURGERY. THE LOT NUMBERS OF THE REPORTED PRODUCTS ARE UNKNOWN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT AS A RESULT OF THE VERIFICATION, IT BECAME CLEAR THAT IT WAS A HUMAN ERROR. IN A LATERAL DECUBITUS POSITION, A CAGE WAS INSERTED USING THE OLIF AT THIS HOSPITAL, AND THEN THE PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREW (PPS) WAS PERFORMED AS IS IN A LATERAL DECUBITUS POSITION. UPON NAVIGATION AFTER THE CAGE INSERTION, THE VERTEBRAL BODY MOVES DUE TO THE CAGE, SO THE O-ARM IMAGING WAS PERFORMED AGAIN NAVIGATION WAS USED; ACCIDENTALLY SELECTED THE O-ARM IMAGING DATA BEFORE INSERTING THE CAGE ON THE NAVIGATION EVEN DURING PPS, AND THE SCREW WAS INSERTED UNNOTICED AS IS. THEREFORE, IT WAS DECIDED THAT EVEN THOUGH THE SCREW INSERTION WAS ACCURATE ON THE N

    Patient problems: Unspecified Nervous System Problem

    MAUDE report 15786843 ↗

Other Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system devices

All Thoracolumbosacral pedicle screw system devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page