Duran AnCore™ 620RG29Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · RING 620RG29 DURAN ANCORE ANNULO 29L · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169793392), received between Apr 10, 2019 and Jan 13, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information6
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size2
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information4
- No Information4
- Mitral Regurgitation2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 13, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT REPORTED THE REPLACEMENT DEVICE AS ANOTHER MANUFACTURERS BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) STATED, "THIS WAS AT NO FAULT TO THE RING". NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21142479 ↗InjuryDec 19, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16005250 ↗InjuryMay 18, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. IT WAS REPORTED THERE WAS NO MALFUNCTION OF THE DEVICE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14428661 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2022Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13441394 ↗InjuryAug 24, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC DEVICE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOTED AS "PHYSICIAN PREFERENCE". NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Regurgitation; No Information
MAUDE report 10442297 ↗InjuryJun 10, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT AND REPLACEMENT PRODUCT WERE NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 10138842 ↗InjuryJan 13, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT IMMEDIATELY POST IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, SEVERE REGURGITATION WAS STILL PRESENT. THEREFORE, THE RING WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 27MM ANNULOPLASTY RING OF THE SAME MODEL. IMMEDIATELY POST IMPLANT OF THE 27MM ANNULOPLASTY RING, MILD REGURGITATION REMAINED. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO REMOVE THE RING AND PERFORM A MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH A 29MM BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Regurgitation
MAUDE report 9583717 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2019Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Split, Cut or Torn
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT IMMEDIATELY POST IMPLANT OF THIS 29MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC RING OF A LARGER SIZE. THE PHYSICIAN INTENDED TO IMPLANT A 31MM MEDTRONIC RING ORIGINALLY, BUT THE HOSPITAL DID NOT HAVE ONE IN STOCK, AND THEREFORE THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED THE 29MM RING OF THE SAME MODEL. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT'S ANNULUS WAS TOO LARGE COMPARED TO THE 29MM RING. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8533176 ↗InjuryApr 10, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT IMMEDIATELY POST IMPLANT OF THE 29MM ANNULOPLASTY RING, THE RING WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8498350 ↗
Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL32Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death71 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R28Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death67 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death65 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638RL32Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY59 reports
- Tri-Ad™ 900SFC228Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY4 deaths56 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL34Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY51 reports
- Contour 3D® 690R30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death50 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638RL30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death47 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page