Skip to content

Duran AnCore™ 620RG35Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · RING 620RG35 DURAN ANCORE ANNULO 29L · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169793422), received between Oct 16, 2018 and Dec 18, 2025 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information4
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information5
  • No Information2

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 35MM TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 33MM TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY RING OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE 35MM TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY RING WAS SUTURED IN PLACE AND AFTER SALINE LEAK TEST IT WAS DETERMINED TO BE REMOVED AND A SMALLER RING WAS IMPLANTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23836491 ↗
  • InjuryDec 11, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 WEEKS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 35MM TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS INCOMPLETE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20907351 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 35MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A N ON-MEDTRONIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS REPORTED TO BE DUE TO THE PHYSICIAN DETERMINING THAT THE MITRAL VALVE WAS BEYOND REPAIR AFTER SUTURING THE RING IN PLACE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS NO ISSUE WITH THE ANNULOPLASTY DEVICE. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A PROLAPSED MITRAL VALVE AND A FLAILED LEAFLET. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 15140771 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 2 YEARS AND 11 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 35MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 33MM MITRAL RING OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS THAT "THE DOCTOR WASN'T HAPPY WITH THE ORIGINAL REPAIR AND THOUGHT HE COULD IMPROVE IT". NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12338993 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT DURING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 35MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12017680 ↗
  • InjuryMay 20, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS 35MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING WAS IMPLANTED AND EXPLANTED DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH A NON MEDTRONIC DEVICE. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8624228 ↗
  • InjuryOct 16, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE IMPLANT OF THIS 35MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 32MM RING OF A DIFFERENT MODEL. THE REASON FOR EXPLANT IS UNKNOWN. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7970290 ↗

Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices

All RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.