Angiographic Guide Wire 007042 (UDI 00643169856714)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · WIRE ANG 007042 10PK 9266S.035 145 3MMJ · Class 2
All models of Angiographic Guide Wire (8)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169856714), received between Jun 7, 2018 and Sep 22, 2021 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Peeled/Delaminated2
- Flaked1
- Kinked1
- Material Deformation1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 22, 2021Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
DURING A PROCEDURE A 145CM J TIP ANGIO GUIDEWIRE WAS BEING USED TO TREAT A MODERATELY TORTUOUS, MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. NO DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE PACKAGING. NO ISSUES WERE NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING PER THE IFU. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES, THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU WITH NO ISSUES IDENTIFIED. THE WIRE TIP WAS FORMED BY THE PHYSICIAN. THE LESION WAS NOT PRE-DILATED, THE DEVICE DID NOT PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY-DEPLOYED STENT, RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE AND EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED DURING INSERTION/DELIVERY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN REMOVING THE J WIRE FROM THE DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER IN THE PATIENT, THE WIRE FELT GRITTY, THE WIRE WAS WIPED ON A GAUZE AND GREEN RESIDUE WAS REMOVED. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED BY ANOTHER MEDTRONIC PRODUCT. THE PATIENT IS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12511369 ↗MalfunctionJun 3, 2021Flaked; Flaked
DURING A TAVR PROCEDURE AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE ONE ANGIO GUIDEWIRE TO TREAT A NON TORTUOUS AND NON CALCIFIED LESION. THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUE NOTED. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES. THE WIRE TIP WAS NOT FORMED. RESISTANCE WAS EXPERIENCED DURING INSERTION. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WIRE KINKED WHEN IN THE PATIENT. DAMAGE WAS NOTED TO THE DEVICE POST REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT. WHEN INSERTING THE WIRE INTO THE CATHETER IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS A GRINDING FEELING AND ON REMOVAL IT WAS NOTICED THAT A SMALL AMOUNT OF THE COLOUR ON THE WIRE HAD FLAKED OFF. THE WIRE WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER WIRE AND THE TAVR CASE WAS CONTINUED WITHOUT ISSUE WITH NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT IS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11929296 ↗MalfunctionOct 14, 2020Peeled/Delaminated; Material Integrity Problem; Peeled/Delaminated; Material Integrity Problem
ONE ANGIOGRAPHIC GUIDE WIRE WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE COATING WIPED OFF THE GUIDE WIRE AFTER USE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10677630 ↗MalfunctionJul 28, 2020Physical Resistance/Sticking
ELDERLY MALE WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE HAVING A HEART CATHETERIZATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE J WIRE STUCK IN THE LOOP. HO KNOWN HARM TO PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10331827 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2018Kinked; Material Deformation; Kinked; Material Deformation
TWO ANGIOGRAPHIC 0.035" WIRES WERE INTENDED TO BE USED DURING A PROCEDURE. ONLY ONE DEVICE WAS USED IN THE PATIENT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, A FEMORAL APPROACH WAS USED TO ACCESS THE OSTIUM OF THE RCA. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PACKAGING. THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED TO THE DEVICES WHEN REMOVING FROM THE PACKAGING PER IFU. BOTH WIRES WERE INSPECTED AND PREPPED PER IFU WITHOUT ISSUES. THE WIRE TIPS WERE NOT FORMED BY THE PHYSICIAN. POOR STEERABILITY WAS NOTED. IT WAS ALSO NOTED DURING REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE USED IN THE PATIENT, THAT THE COILS WERE SEPARATED AND THE WIRE WAS KINKED. THE SECOND WIRE WAS TESTED OUTSIDE THE PATIENT AND KINKED. PATIENT ALIVE WITH NO INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7577193 ↗
Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices
- HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT UNIVERSAL II 1009664Abbott Vascular Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER321 reports
- SYNCHRO 14 M00313010Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls220 reports
- PressureWire™ C12059Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER1 death296 reports
- SYNCHRO 2 M00326410Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls155 reports
- ENROUTE .014" Guidewire 11686-01Silk Road Medical, Inc. · Wire, Guide, Catheter2 deaths228 reports
- ARROW IPN035915Teleflex Incorporated · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER217 reports
- OmniWire Pressure guide wire 89185Philips Image Guided Therapy Corporation · Wire, Guide, Catheter1 recall1 death160 reports
- ARROW IPN055780Teleflex Incorporated · Wire, guide, catheter4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page