Skip to content

SYNCHRO 14 M00313010Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · Neuro Guidewire with Hydrophilic Coating · Class 2

All models of SYNCHRO 14 (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

2 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Quick summary

This Stryker Synchro 14 guidewire is a thin wire used to guide catheters through brain blood vessels. Its 220 reports mostly describe the wire fracturing or its coating peeling, and some describe the tip breaking inside the vessel. There were 28 injuries and no deaths. Reports fell in the last 12 months, with 4 compared with 19 in the year before. There are 2 open recalls, covering possibly high levels of bacterial toxins and coating damage on certain lots.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
220
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
28
Recalls naming it
2

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 220 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 07613252186922), received between Nov 17, 2016 and Aug 31, 2026 — classified as 28 injuries, 192 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (126 reports).

2 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 2 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 6 reportsDec 2023: 4 reportsJan 2024: 5 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 2 reportsApr 2024: 7 reportsMay 2024: 8 reportsJun 2024: 5 reportsJul 2024: 7 reportsAug 2024: 4 reportsSep 2024: 6 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 4 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 4 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 2 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 3 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 1 reportsAug 2026: 2 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520268
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Apr 23, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified

    Neurovascular devices did not meet the minimum sample size required for endotoxin testing during manufacturing processes and are out of compliance with the AAMI ST72 standard, so these devices may exceed the acceptable limits of endotoxin levels; high levels of endotoxins may increase the risk of fever, shock and aseptic meningitis.

    Z-1909-2024 · Root cause: Process design · Recall details · FDA record ↗

  2. Apr 18, 2024Class IIOpen, Classified

    Stryker Neurovascular has observed an increased frequency of PTFE coating damage occurring on the Synchro Guidewires that may be caused by the practice of backloading the guidewire through the optional introducer accessory. This issue is limited to certain lots of the Synchro Guidewire that contain an older version of the introducer accessory. Due to variation in the manufacturing process of the supplier of the introducer accessory, certain lots of introducers have sharper than intended edges that can peel off the PTFE coating when physicians use a technique known as backloading. Users with impacted product in their inventory are cautioned not to use this backloading technique.

    Z-1939-2024 · Root cause: Component design/selection · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture126
  • Peeled/Delaminated86
  • Break10
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Flaked2
  • Material Separation1
  • Material Too Rigid or Stiff1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions166
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient37
  • Foreign Body In Patient7
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient4
  • No Patient Involvement4
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque3
  • Headache2
  • Cognitive Changes1

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 220 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 31, 2026Fracture

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50517919 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2026Fracture

    It was reported during the procedure the subject guidewire could not be pushed inside the microcatheter. When the physician withdrew the device, the guidewire was found fractured near the distal tip. It was replaced and the procedure was completed successfully with no clinical consequences to the patient.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50453716 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 20, 2026Fracture

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25883068 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 30, 2026Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE DISTAL TIP WAS BROKEN AS THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE HAS BEEN REMOVED MANUALLY. THE BROKEN SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE DISTAL TIP HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE ARTERY WITH THE STENT RETRIEVER. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24222856 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 17, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE WAS FOUND FRACTURED ALONG THE NITINOL TUBING WITH THE PLATINUM WIRE STRETCHED. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23320025 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE, THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE TIP BROKE OFF INSIDE THE BALLOON. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23099435 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 16, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO REACTION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE GUIDEWIRE (SUBJECT DEVICE) WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO MANIPULATE THE GUIDEWIRE AT THE TARGET SITE. WHEN THE GUIDEWIRE WAS WITHDRAWN THE DISTAL TIP WAS NOTED TO BE FRACTURED. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23067074 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 2, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING STENT IMPLANTATION FOR MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY STENOSIS, THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THAT THE DISTAL END OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE DID NOT MOVE WHEN MANIPULATING IT AND UPON RE-EXAMINATION UNDER IMAGING, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE TIP OF THE GUIDEWIRE HAD FRACTURED. THE PHYSICIAN ADVANCED THE MICROCATHETER TO A HIGH POSITION NEAR THE PROXIMAL POINT OF THE FRACTURED SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE PART LEFT INSIDE PATIENT'S BODY. THROUGH NEGATIVE PRESSURE ASPIRATION, THE FRACTURED SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE PART WAS DRAWN INTO THE MICROCATHETER, WHICH WAS THEN ENTIRELY WITHDRAWN FROM THE BODY. THE GUIDEWIRE WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22946616 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BASILAR ARTERY (BA) THROMBECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE THROMBUS WAS DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE BA. THE OPERATOR SELECTED A MICROCATHETER AND A SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE TO ESTABLISH THE PATHWAY. AFTER NORMAL FLUSHING AND WETTING OF THE PRODUCTS, THE MICROCATHETER WAS DELIVERED. WHEN THE MICROCATHETER REACHED THE PROXIMAL END OF THE THROMBUS, THE OPERATOR ADVANCED THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE THROUGH THE THROMBUS INTO THE POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY (PCA) IN ORDER TO DELIVER THE MICROCATHETER PAST THE THROMBUS. HOWEVER, WHEN THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE REACHED THE MIDDLE SEGMENT OF THE THROMBUS, SIGNIFICANT RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED, PREVENTING FURTHER ADVANCEMENT OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE. THE OPERATOR TWISTED AND ADJUSTED THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE, BUT IT STILL COULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE LESION. NEXT, THE OPERATOR WITHDREW THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE INTO THE MICROCATHETER AND PLANNED TO RESHAPE THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE BEFORE ATTEMPTING AGAIN. AFTER RETRACTING THE TIP OF THE GUIDEWIRE INTO THE MICROCATHETER, THE OPERATOR CONTINUED TO WITHDRAW THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE BUT FOUND THAT IT HAD FRACTURED APPROXIMATELY 35 CM FROM THE TIP. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WA

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22731856 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT OF AN INFARCTION IN THE A2 SEGMENT OF THE LEFT ANTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY (ACA), THE OPERATOR SUCCESSFULLY DELIVERED A LONG SHEATH TO THE TARGET LOCATION AND A PATHWAY WAS ESTABLISHED USING AN INTERMEDIATE CATHETER, A MICROCATHETER, AND THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE OPERATOR ATTEMPTED THROMBECTOMY USING A STENT RETRIEVER, BUT THE RESULTS WERE UNSATISFACTORY AFTER TWO ATTEMPTS. DURING THE THIRD SUPERSELECTIVE NAVIGATION WITH THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE, THE TORQUE CONTROL AT THE GUIDEWIRE TIP WAS INADEQUATE. UPON WITHDRAWAL, SLIGHT DEFORMATION OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE TIP WAS OBSERVED. WHEN FURTHER SUPERSELECTIVE NAVIGATION WAS ATTEMPTED WITH THE SAME GUIDEWIRE, IT COMPLETELY LOST TORQUE CONTROL. UPON RETRACTION AND INSPECTION, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE WAS FRACTURED AND THE CORE WIRE REMAINED INTACT. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22731685 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING TREATMENT OF ANEURYSM AT THE ORIGIN OF THE POSTERIOR INFERIOR CEREBELLAR ARTERY (PICA) PROCEDURE, THE OPERATOR DELIVERED THE LONG SHEATH TO THE DESIRED POSITION, ESTABLISHED A TRI-AXIAL ACCESS USING A SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE, MICROCATHETER, AND INTERMEDIATE CATHETER. ONCE THE INTERMEDIATE CATHETER WAS IN PLACE, THE OPERATOR CONTINUED TO ADVANCE THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE FOR FURTHER SELECTION. HOWEVER, DURING THIS PROCESS, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE COULD NOT BE MOVED. THE OPERATOR WITHDREW THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE AND DISCOVERED THAT APPROXIMATELY 10 CM OF THE DISTAL END HAD BROKEN OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE OPERATOR USED A MICROCATHETER TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN GUIDEWIRE SEGMENT. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22475168 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 30, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN OPHTHALMIC ARTERY SEGMENT ANEURYSM PROCEDURE, THE OPERATOR ESTABLISHED THE ACCESS PATHWAY USING THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE AND A MICROCATHETER. AFTER THE MICROCATHETER WAS DELIVERED INTO THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY, THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE WAS ADVANCED THROUGH IT. DURING THE ADVANCEMENT, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED WHEN APPROXIMATELY HALF OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE'S LENGTH HAD BEEN DELIVERED, PREVENTING FURTHER FORWARD MOVEMENT. THE OPERATOR WITHDREW THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE AND FOUND THAT THE DISTAL END HAD BROKEN OFF. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22359016 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 26, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE DISTAL TIP WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22341204 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 21, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PROCEDURE AT THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) ANEURYSM, THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE BROKE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2025 STATES THAT THE PATIENT HAD A DIRECT BLEED DURING THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. UPDATE: IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE AT THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) ANEURYSM, THE DISTAL OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE BROKE. THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE TIP DETACHED FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE GUIDEWIRE WHILE ATTEMPTING TO CROSS THE GIANT ANEURYSM USING TORQUE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 12-MAY-2025 INDICATED THAT THE ADVERSE EVENT WAS NOT RELATED TO THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED: ¿THE ANEURYSM SIZE WAS LARGE, AND THESE CASES CARRY A HIGH RISK OF RUPTURE.¿ THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE FOLLOWING DAY USING A STENT AND COILING. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21875313 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 12, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A THROMBUS RETRIEVAL SURGERY, THE PHYSICIAN UTILIZED THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE TO SELECT THE EMBOLIZED BLOOD VESSEL. DURING THE SELECTION PROCESS, THE PHYSICIAN TORQUED THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE. HOWEVER, DURING THE TORQUE MANIPULATION, THE MIDDLE SECTION OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE BROKE WHEN POSITIONED AT THE DISTAL SEGMENT OF THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA), ALTHOUGH THE CORE WIRE REMAINED PARTIALLY CONNECTED. THE PHYSICIAN CAREFULLY WITHDREW THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE SLOWLY TOWARDS THE PROXIMAL END UNTIL IT WAS FULLY WITHDRAWN INTO THE GUIDING CATHETER. SUBSEQUENTLY, WHEN WITHDRAWING THE GUIDING CATHETER, THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE COMPLETELY FRACTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21590431 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 6, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE DISTAL TIP WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21538348 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 5, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE DISTAL TIP WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21531975 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 3, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION REVEALED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE WAS BROKEN/FRACTURED DURING USE. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21510003 ↗
  • InjuryJan 17, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING AN ACUTE THROMBECTOMY CASE, THE TIP OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE WAS FRACTURED SO THE OPERATOR HAD TO TAKE THE FRACTURED PART OUT WITH A BALLOON. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. SURGICAL DELAY OF 60 MINUTES WAS OBSERVED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21178724 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, COATING PEELED OFF PROXIMALLY AFTER THE TORQUE DEVICE WAS PUT OVER THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20728672 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE, COATING PEELED OFF PROXIMALLY AFTER THE TORQUE DEVICE WAS PUT OVER THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20727623 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 15, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS, THE INVESTIGATION OF THE DEVICE REVEALED THAT THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE (PTFE) COATING WAS PEELING. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20695277 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 5, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    THE GUIDEWIRE (SUBJECT DEVICE) WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND DURING DEVICE INVESTIGATION, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE (SUBJECT DEVICE) PTFE (POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE) INNER COATING WAS PEELING FROM THE BODY OF THE GUIDEWIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20611763 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 22, 2024Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN SHAPING THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE WITH SHAPING NEEDLE, THE COATING OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE PEELED OFF. THERE WERE NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20507710 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE WHEN ADVANCING THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE TO THE RIGHT POSTERIOR CEREBRAL ARTERY (PCA) THE OPERATOR NOTICED THAT THE DISTAL END OF THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE DID NOT RESPOND TO PROXIMAL MANIPULATION. THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE WAS WITHDRAWN, BUT THE DISTAL PORTION DID NOT COME OUT WITH IT. UPON REMOVAL, THE OPERATOR DISCOVERED THAT THE SUBJECT GUIDEWIRE HAD FRACTURED, THE FRACTURED SECTION OF THE GUIDEWIRE REMAINED INSIDE THE MIDDLE CATHETER. THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS REPLACED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED TO THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20261724 ↗

Other WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices

All WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page