Skip to content

Visia AF MRI™ S VR SureScan™ DVFC3D4 (UDI 00643169988644)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · ICD DVFC3D4 VISIA AF S VR DF4 MRI US · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Visia AF MRI S VR SureScan (7)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00643169988644), received between Mar 8, 2019 and May 31, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Sensing Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Sensing Problem3
  • Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation2
  • Pacing Problem1

Patient problems

  • Shock from Patient Lead(s)2
  • Chest Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 31, 2023Pacing Problem; Device Sensing Problem; Pacing Problem; Device Sensing Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT DUE TO CHEST PAIN. THE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) WAS INTERROGATED AND SHOWED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED ANTI-TACHYCARDIA PACING (ATP) FOR A DEVICE-CLASSIFIED EPISODE IN THE VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION (VF) ZONE. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT A DISCRIMINATOR DETERMINED THE RHYTHM TO ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN SUPRA VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA (SVT), HOWEVER THE DISCRIMINATOR WAS PROGRAMMED TO MONITOR ONLY AND THE ATP WAS NOT WITHHELD AS A RESULT. THE ICD REMAINS IN USE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Chest Pain

    MAUDE report 17029959 ↗
  • InjuryAug 2, 2022Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem; Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) DETECTED AN ATRIAL ARRHYTHMIA FOLLOWED BY RAPID VENTRICULAR RESPONSE AS FAST VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA AND DELIVERED MULTIPLE INAPPROPRIATE THERAPIES. THE ICD REMAINS IN USE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Shock from Patient Lead(s)

    MAUDE report 15147827 ↗
  • InjuryMar 8, 2019Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem; Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation; Device Sensing Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE PATIENT THAT THEIR IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR (ICD) WAS ¿BEEPING¿. IN ADDITION, THE PATIENT REPORTED THEY RECEIVED A SHOCK AND SENT A WIRELESS TRANSMISSION THEIR PHYSICIAN. THE PATIENT REPORTED THE PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS IN ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AF), AND ¿IT SOMEHOW TRICKED MY DEVICE TO THINK MY HEART RATE WAS GOING VERY FAST.¿ THE ICD REMAINS IN USE. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Shock from Patient Lead(s)

    MAUDE report 8404049 ↗

Other Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT) devices

All Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page