Skip to content

N/A 3155637Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · BUR 3155637 OTO-FLEX .7MM CARB GREEN · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
14
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 14 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00681490070492), received between Oct 28, 2020 and Jan 30, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 11 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Vibration” (14 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 2 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Vibration14

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions11
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient9
  • Bone Fracture(s)3

Recent adverse event reports

The 14 most recent of 14 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 30, 2025Vibration; Vibration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRE-OP, THE BURS WERE WOBBLING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21271015 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 30, 2025Vibration; Vibration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING SERVICING SKEETER DRILL AND BURS WERE WOBBLING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED IN THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21270838 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    ON FOLLOW-UP IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BUR WAS SEATED CORRECTLY. IT WAS VERIFIED BY THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE SEVERAL TIMES, AND THE SURGEON HAS BEEN USING THIS TYPE OF DRILL FOR OVER 15 YEARS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10805436 ↗
  • InjuryNov 5, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    IT WAS REPORTED BY A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL THAT ALL OF THE DRILLS AND BURS USED BY THE DOCTOR DURING THE STAPEDECTOMY, THE DEVICE WOBBLED INSTEAD OF ROTATING IN A STABLE FASHION. INSTEAD OF THE BUR CREATING A SMALL OPENING IN THE INCUS, A FRACTURE WAS CREATED INSTEAD. THIS HAPPENED LAST WEEK WITH A DIFFERENT PATIENT. HOWEVER, THIS TIME,THE DOCTOR WAS NOT CERTAIN THAT ALL OF THE FRAGMENT OUT IN ITS ENTIRETY. UPON FOLLOW UP IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT NO BUR FRAGMENT WAS SUSPECTED TO BE LEFT BEHIND, AS THE BUR DID NOT BREAK.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 10790098 ↗
  • InjuryNov 4, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER REPORTED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE EVENT DURING STAPEDECTOMY CAUSED A FRACTURE IN INCUS INSTEAD OF A CONTROLLED DRILLING. TWO BURS WERE USED IN THE CASE AND BOTH WOBBLED. THE BURS DID NOT ROTATE PROPERLY - THE TIP OSCILLATES OR 'WOBBLES'. THE FRAGMENT WAS RECOVERED SO THERE WAS NO LONG-LASTING HARM TO THE PATIENT HOWEVER, THE PROCEDURE DID NOT GO AS PLANNED. THERE WAS 20 MINUTES DELAY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 10786331 ↗
  • InjuryNov 4, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER REPORTED VIA MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE EVENT DURING STAPEDECTOMY CAUSED A FRACTURE IN INCUS INSTEAD OF A CONTROLLED DRILLING. TWO BURS WERE USED IN THE CASE AND BOTH WOBBLED. THE BURS DID NOT ROTATE PROPERLY - THE TIP OSCILLATES OR 'WOBBLES'. THE FRAGMENT WAS RECOVERED SO THERE WAS NO LONG-LASTING HARM TO THE PATIENT HOWEVER, THE PROCEDURE DID NOT GO AS PLANNED. THERE WAS 20 MINUTES DELAY.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 10786279 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    IT WAS REPORTED BY A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL THAT THE DRILL AND BUR USED BY THE DOCTOR DURING THE STAPEDECTOMY WOBBLED INSTEAD OF ROTATING IN A STABLE FASHION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT ALTHOUGH THE BUR WAS IN CONTACT WITH PATIENT. THE DEVICES WERE STILL USED AND ABLE TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE APPROXIMATELY 5 MINUTES DELAY IN THE 45 MINUTES PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10779707 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    IT WAS REPORTED BY A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL THAT THE DRILL AND BUR USED BY THE DOCTOR DURING THE STAPEDECTOMY WOBBLED INSTEAD OF ROTATING IN A STABLE FASHION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT ALTHOUGH THE BUR WAS IN CONTACT WITH PATIENT. THE DEVICES WERE STILL USED AND ABLE TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE APPROXIMATELY 5 MINUTES DELAY IN THE 45 MINUTES PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10779587 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 3, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    ON FOLLOW-UP IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BUR WAS SEATED CORRECTLY. IT WAS VERIFIED BY THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE SEVERAL TIMES, AND THE SURGEON HAS BEEN USING THIS TYPE OF DRILL FOR OVER 15 YEARS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10779353 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    ON FOLLOW-UP IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BUR WAS SEATED CORRECTLY. IT WAS VERIFIED BY THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE SEVERAL TIMES, AND THE SURGEON HAS BEEN USING THIS TYPE OF DRILL FOR OVER 15 YEARS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10748853 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    ON FOLLOW-UP IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BUR WAS SEATED CORRECTLY. IT WAS VERIFIED BY THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE SEVERAL TIMES, AND THE SURGEON HAS BEEN USING THIS TYPE OF DRILL FOR OVER 15 YEARS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10748782 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    EACH OF THE REPORTED BURS THAT WOBBLED WERE INITIAL USE, NOT REPROCESSED, AND SOME WOBBLED RIGHT OUT OF THE PACKAGE. TO TROUBLESHOOT THE ISSUE, THE DOCTOR TRIED USING THE BURS IN DIFFERENT HANDPIECES, TO SEE THE RESULT. EACH OF THE BURS WOBBLED IN A SECOND HANDPIECE; HOWEVER, IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE WAS VARIABILITY ON HOW MUCH OF A WOBBLE WAS EVIDENT WITH EACH HANDPIECE (EITHER MORE WOBBLE, OR LESS). THE FACILITY DETERMINED THAT THIS WAS AN ISSUE WITH THEIR HANDPIECE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10748702 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    EACH OF THE REPORTED BURS THAT WOBBLED WERE INITIAL USE, NOT REPROCESSED, AND SOME WOBBLED RIGHT OUT OF THE PACKAGE. TO TROUBLESHOOT THE ISSUE, THE DOCTOR TRIED USING THE BURS IN DIFFERENT HANDPIECES, TO SEE THE RESULT. EACH OF THE BURS WOBBLED IN A SECOND HANDPIECE; HOWEVER, IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE WAS VARIABILITY ON HOW MUCH OF A WOBBLE WAS EVIDENT WITH EACH HANDPIECE (EITHER MORE WOBBLE, OR LESS). THE FACILITY DETERMINED THAT THIS WAS AN ISSUE WITH THEIR HANDPIECE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10748122 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2020Vibration; Vibration

    EACH OF THE REPORTED BURS THAT WOBBLED WERE INITIAL USE, NOT REPROCESSED, AND SOME WOBBLED RIGHT OUT OF THE PACKAGE. TO TROUBLESHOOT THE ISSUE, THE DOCTOR TRIED USING THE BURS IN DIFFERENT HANDPIECES, TO SEE THE RESULT. EACH OF THE BURS WOBBLED IN A SECOND HANDPIECE; HOWEVER, IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE WAS VARIABILITY ON HOW MUCH OF A WOBBLE WAS EVIDENT WITH EACH HANDPIECE (EITHER MORE WOBBLE, OR LESS). THE FACILITY DETERMINED THAT THIS WAS AN ISSUE WITH THEIR HANDPIECE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10747944 ↗

Other BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices

All BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page