Skip to content

HANCOCK® HC150-12Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CONDUIT HC150-12 HKI MO 10L · Class 3 · Implant

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00681490908726), received between Feb 21, 2017 and Apr 22, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information4
  • Expiration Date Error1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • No Information2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Pulmonary Valve Stenosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2024Expiration Date Error; Expiration Date Error

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS 12MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT WAS IMPLANTED AT A DATE PAST THE PRODUCT EXPIRATION DATE. THE DEVICE REMAINS IMPLANTED AND NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19152141 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 6 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 12MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 25MM CONDUIT OF THE SAME MODEL. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19004900 ↗
  • InjuryJun 26, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT AN UNKNOWN DURATION POST IMPLANT OF THIS 12MM VALVED CONDUIT, THE CONDUIT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED. THE REASON FOR REPLACEMENT IS UNKNOWN. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7637600 ↗
  • InjuryOct 5, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 12MM PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVED CONDUIT IN A PEDIATRIC PATIENT, THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC 16MM PULMONARY VALVED CONDUIT DUE TO SEVERE PULMONARY STENOSIS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN PERFORMED A VSD CLOSURE AND BIFURCATION PLASTY. NO OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Pulmonary Valve Stenosis

    MAUDE report 6917271 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 21, 2017Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR AND 10 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS PULMONARY BIOPROSTHETIC VALVED CONDUIT IN A PEDIATRIC PATIENT, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED. NO FAILURE MECHANISM WAS PROVIDED. NO OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6347035 ↗

Other replacement Heart-valve devices

All replacement Heart-valve devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.