Skip to content

CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT RSRPERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS - AORTIC 2800 (REF 280021MM)Recalls & reported problems

Edwards Lifesciences LLC · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00690103021653), received between Apr 20, 2021 and Mar 18, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Gradient Increase” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Gradient Increase2
  • Calcified1
  • Device Stenosis1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Dyspnea1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 18, 2025Device Stenosis; Device Stenosis

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH A 21MM 2800 AORTIC VALVE IN AORTIC POSITION UNDERWENT A VALVE-IN-VALVE PROCEDURE AFTER AN IMPLANT DURATION OF 9 YEARS, 1 MONTH DUE TO STENOSIS AND REGURGITATION. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH SHORTNESS OF BREATH. THE TAVR WAS SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED WITH A 20MM 9755RSL VALVE. PATIENT LEFT PROCEDURE AREA STABLE.

    Patient problems: Dyspnea

    MAUDE report 21633211 ↗
  • InjuryApr 13, 2022Calcified; Gradient Increase; Calcified; Gradient Increase

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH A 21MM 2800 AORTIC VALVE UNDERWENT A VALVE-IN-VALVE PROCEDURE AFTER AN IMPLANT DURATION OF 6 YEARS, 5 MONTHS DUE TO SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS SECONDARY TO CALCIFICATION IN THE NONCORONARY CUSP AND RIGHT CORONARY CUSP. THE TAVR WAS PERFORMED WITH A 23MM 9750TFX TRANSCATHETER VALVE AND THE PROCEDURE WENT WELL.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14105087 ↗
  • InjuryApr 20, 2021Fluid/Blood Leak; Gradient Increase; Fluid/Blood Leak; Gradient Increase

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WITH A 21MM 2800 PERICARDIAL VALVE, IMPLANTED IN THE AORTIC POSITION, UNDERWENT A VALVE-IN-VALVE PROCEDURE AFTER AN IMPLANT DURATION OF 17 YEARS, SEVEN (7) MONTHS DUE TO STENOSIS AND REGURGITATION. THE TAVR WAS PERFORMED WITH A 20MM 9750TFX TRANSCATHETER VALVE. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION THAT THE SURGICAL VALVE FAILED OR MALFUNCTIONED PREMATURELY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11697797 ↗

Other replacement Heart-valve devices

All replacement Heart-valve devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page