Skip to content

Edwards Lifesciences Retrograde Cardioplegia Catheter RC2012Recalls & reported problems

Edwards Lifesciences LLC · Retrograde Cardioplegia Catheter · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00690103034370), received between Apr 1, 2022 and Sep 5, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • Perforation of Vessels2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 5, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    PER THE REPORT RECEIVED FROM FRANCE, A RC2012 RETROGRADE CANNULA, EXPERIENCED A BALLOON RUPTURE DURING CORONARY SINUS PERFUSION, APPROXIMATELY 14 MINUTES AFTER CLAMPING, IN THE CONTEXT OF AN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE. DESPITE PRESSURE MONITORING INDICATING NORMAL LEVELS, THE BALLOON BURST UNEXPECTEDLY, RESULTING IN A VISIBLE HERNIA AND PUNCTURE. THIS LED TO THE TERMINATION OF CORONARY INFUSION VIA THE AFFECTED CANNULA. THE RUPTURE OCCURRED WITHOUT OVERPRESSURE AND CAUSED A TEAR IN THE CORONARY SINUS. THE SURGEON SUCCESSFULLY REPAIRED THE DAMAGE USING GLUE OR SUTURES, AND PERFUSION OF THE CORONARIES WAS RESUMED USING AN ALTERNATIVE CANNULA VIA DIRECT ANTEGRADE ACCESS. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE DOING WELL POSTOPERATIVELY.

    Patient problems: Perforation of Vessels

    MAUDE report 22975116 ↗
  • InjuryApr 1, 2022Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON OF RC2012 RETROGRADE CARDIOPLEGIA CANNULA RUPTURED DURING USE WITH A CONCOMITANT RUPTURE OF THE PATIENT'S CORONARY SINUS OCCURRED. THE CANNULA WAS INSERTED TO THE CORONARY SINUS AND THE CARDIOPLEGIA SOLUTION WAS INJECTED. AT FIRST, THE CORONARY SINUS PRESSURE WAS INDICATED AS 20MMHG, HOWEVER THE PRESSURE WENT DOWN TO A SINGLE DIGIT LEVEL. THE CANNULA WAS REMOVED, AND THE BALLOON RUPTURE WAS CONFIRMED THEN. AT THE SAME TIME, THE PATIENT CORONARY SINUS WAS ALSO CONFIRMED TO BE RUPTURED. THE PATIENT CORONARY SINUS WAS REPAIRED AND ANOTHER RC2012 RETROGRADE CARDIOPLEGIA CANNULA WAS USED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED, AND THE PATIENT STATUS WAS REPORTED AS 'UNDER TREATMENT'. THERE WAS NO CALCIFICATION OF CORONARY SINUS. THE FLOW RATE OF CARDIOPLEGIC SOLUTION WAS 200 ML/MIN, BUT THE INJECTION PRESSURE DID NOT RISE, SO THE FLOW RATE WAS RISEN TO 300ML/MIN. THE CANNULA WAS INSERTED WHEN THE PATIENT WAS PARTIALLY ON CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS. THE LOCATION OF THE TIP OF THE CANNULA WAS CORRECT AS THE SURGEON WAS PLACING HIS HAND TO THE PATIENT'S HEART AND CHECKING IT BY THE ECHO. BALLOON INFLATION TEST BEFORE USE WAS PROBABLY NOT PERFORMED. INCONSISTENCIES OF THE D

    Patient problems: Perforation of Vessels

    MAUDE report 13981088 ↗

Other CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS devices

All CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page