Duran AnCore® 620RG25 (UDI 00721902859762)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · RING 620RG25 ANLO DURAN ANCORE CHORD 10L · Class 2
All models of Duran AnCore (42)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00721902859762), received between Mar 24, 2017 and Jan 8, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Device Stenosis1
- Gradient Increase1
- Intravalvular regurgitation1
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
Patient problems
- Mitral Valve Stenosis3
- Insufficient Information2
- Atrial Fibrillation1
- Dyspnea1
- Mitral Regurgitation1
- Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation1
- Non specific EKG/ECG Changes1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 8, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 15 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A BI-VENTRICULAR DEFIB RILLATOR WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE BI-VENTRICULAR DEFIBRILLATOR WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 21100120 ↗InjuryJan 7, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 15 YEARS AND 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE PERMANENT PACEMAKER WAS REPORTED AS 2ND DEGREE ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK (AVB). NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Non specific EKG/ECG Changes
MAUDE report 21095177 ↗InjuryJun 7, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Stenosis; Intravalvular regurgitation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 16 YEARS AND 3 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 29MM BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation; Mitral Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 19492548 ↗InjurySep 19, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 6 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 25MM ANNULOPLASTY RING IMPLANTED IN THE MITRAL POSITION, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION (NYHA) CLASS III SYMPTOMS (DYSPNEA AND EXERCISE INTOLERANCE) AS WELL AS LOWER EXTREMITY SWELLING AND DIFFICULT TO CONTROL PRE-EXISTING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (AFIB). TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAM (TEE) REVEALED MITRAL REGURGITATION AND MODERATE STENOSIS. THE PATIENT SUBSEQUENTLY UNDERWENT RIGHT AND LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION AT AN UNKNOWN TIME POST IMPLANT. ULTIMATELY, 10 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THE ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 27MM BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE. DURING PLACEMENT OF THE MITRAL VALVE, THE NATIVE ANTERIOR LEAFLET WAS BISECTED AND BROUGHT TO THE 4 AND 8 O'CLOCK POSITION. THE ENTIRE POSTERIOR LEAFLET AND VALVULAR STRUCTURES WERE RETAINED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT IMMEDIATELY AFTER IMPLANT OF THIS 26MM TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY RING, TEE CONFIRMED MODERATE REGURGITATION. NO INTERVENTIONS OR ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Atrial Fibrillation; Dyspnea; Mitral Regurgitation; Mitral Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 7889228 ↗InjuryMar 24, 2017Gradient Increase; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Gradient Increase; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT APPROXIMATELY NINE YEARS POST IMPLANT OF THIS ANNULOPLASTY RING, THIS DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE DUE TO STENOSIS. NO OTHER ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Mitral Valve Stenosis
MAUDE report 6431914 ↗
Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL32Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death71 reports
- PROFILE 3D® 680R28Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death67 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death65 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638RL32Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY59 reports
- Tri-Ad™ 900SFC228Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY4 deaths56 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL34Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY51 reports
- Contour 3D® 690R30Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death50 reports
- CG FUTURE™ 638BL28Medtronic, Inc. · RING, ANNULOPLASTY1 death47 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page