Skip to content

Duran AnCore® 620RG31 (UDI 00721902859809)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · RING 620RG31 ANLO DURAN ANCORE CHORD 10L · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Duran AnCore (42)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00721902859809), received between Dec 12, 2018 and Nov 7, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2

Patient problems

  • Cardiomyopathy2
  • No Information2
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 7, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 5 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A REPLACEMENT DEFIBRILLATOR WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE DEFIBRILLATOR WAS REPORTED AS CARDIOMYOPATHY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Cardiomyopathy

    MAUDE report 20631626 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2024Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 1 YEAR AND 3 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, A DEFIBRILLATOR WAS IMPLANTED. THE REASON FOR THE DEFIBRILLATOR WAS REPORTED AS CARDIOMYOPATHY. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Cardiomyopathy

    MAUDE report 20631544 ↗
  • InjuryJan 26, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 12 YEARS AND 7 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS 31MM MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, IT WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 33 MM VALVE. THE REASON FOR THE REPLACEMENT WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11228667 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 17, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT FOUR YEARS AND FIVE MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY RING, THE RING WAS EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-MEDTRONIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE FOR UNKNOWN REASONS. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8346522 ↗
  • InjuryDec 12, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT 10 YEARS AND 4 MONTHS POST IMPLANT OF THIS ANNULOPLASTY RING IN THE AORTIC POSITION, A TRANSCATHETER VALVE WAS IMPLANTED VALVE-IN-ANNULOPLASTY RING. THE REASON FOR INTERVENTION WAS NOT REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8155988 ↗

Other RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices

All RING, ANNULOPLASTY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page