Skip to content

Bio-Medicus™ 96570-121Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CANNULA 96570-121 BIO-MEDICUS 21FR EA · Class 2

All models of Bio-Medicus (59)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000116101), received between Jan 19, 2023 and Jun 9, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Crack2
  • Material Puncture/Hole2
  • Contamination1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2025Contamination; Contamination

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT PRIOR TO USE OF A BIO-MEDICUS NEXTGEN FEMORAL ARTERIAL/JUGULAR VENOUS CANNULA, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A FOREIGN MATERIAL WITHIN THE PACKAGE. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, SO NO ADVERSE EFFECT OCCURRED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22167824 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 5, 2024Crack; Material Puncture/Hole; Crack; Material Puncture/Hole

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT PRIOR TO USE OF A BIO-MEDICUS NEXTGEN FEMORAL ARTERIAL CANNULA, IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER UNPACKING, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE CANNULA CLAMP AREA WAS DAMAGED AND THE INTERNAL GUIDE DEVICE WAS FLAT. THE CUSTOMER WAS WORRIED ABOUT THE RISK OF USING IT, SO IT WAS DISCARDED IMMEDIATELY.THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, SO NO ADVERSE EFFECT OCCURRED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19678854 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 15, 2023Crack; Crack

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT PRIOR TO USE OF A BIO-MEDICUS NEXTGEN FEMORAL ARTERIAL OR JUGULARVENOUS CANNULA, IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN PREPARING FOR INSERTION OF THE DEVICE, A CRACK WAS DISCOVERED ON THE CONNECTOR OF THE CANNULA. THERE HAD BEEN NO EXTERNAL IMPACT ON THE CANNULA AND THE CRACK WAS DETECTED BEFORE INSERTION INTO THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT SO NO ADVERSE EFFECT OCCURRED. MEDTRONIC RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT THE CANNULA WAS NOT HEATED OR COOLED PRIOR TO USE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT BLOOD LOSS OR TRANSFUSION REQUIRED AS THE CRACK WAS DETECTED BEFORE INSERTION INTO THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE PACKAGING (OUTER BOX, INNER PACKAGING OR STERILE BARRIER). NO OTHER DEVICES IN THE SAME BOX/SHIPPING CONTAINER WERE DAMAGED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16544210 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 19, 2023Material Puncture/Hole; Material Puncture/Hole

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT PRIOR TO USE OF A BIO-MEDICUS NEXTGEN FEMORAL ARTERIAL CANNULA, THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT WHEN THEY OPENED THE DEVICE PACKAGE THEY OBSERVED A CRACK IN THE CONNECTOR. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, SO NO ADVERSE EFFECT OCCURRED. MEDTRONIC RECEIVED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT NO DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED TO THE PACKAGING AND THE STERILE BARRIER WAS NOT COMPROMISED. THE HEMOSTASIS CAP WAS NOT USED WHEN THE INTRODUCER WAS INSERTED INTO THE CANNULA BODY CONNECTOR.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16202326 ↗

Other Catheter, cannula and tubing, vascular, cardiopulmonary bypass devices

All Catheter, cannula and tubing, vascular, cardiopulmonary bypass devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page