Skip to content

N/A 2035URecalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · CABLE 2035U ELECTRICAL UMBILICAL ROHS · Class 3

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00763000279769), received between Jun 26, 2024 and Jun 26, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Protective Measures Problem” (1 report).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier.

2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P020045); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Mar 23, 2021Terminated

    Firm received increased number of reports that VenaSeal dispensing systems are not effectively advancing the adhesive forward through the delivery catheter.

    Z-1564-2021 · Root cause: Device Design · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Protective Measures Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Protective Measures Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Protective Measures Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CRYO ABLATION PROCEDURE, THE CONSOLE COULD NOT RECOGNIZE THE TWO FOCAL CATHETERS AFTER CONNECTION. THE ELECTRICAL UMBILICAL CABLE, AUTO CONNECTION BOX AND FOCAL CATHETER WERE REPLACED WITHOUT RESOLUTION. THE CASE WAS ABORTED WHILE THE PATIENT WAS UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. AFTER THE CASE, TROUBLE SHOOTING WAS CARRIED OUT. THE CONSOLE RECOGNIZED THE TEST FOCAL CATHETER. BOTH OF THE FOCAL CATHETERS THAT WERE USED IN THE CASE WERE CONNECTED TO THE ELECTRICAL UMBILICAL CABLE, AND THE ISSUE REOCCURRED. A PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE WAS LATER CARRIED OUT AND THE LOAD CELL WAS NOT AS EXPECTED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE ROOM TEMPERATURE WAS COLD. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19619779 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P020045. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2777-2015 · Sep 1, 2015 · Terminated
    Medtronic CryoConsole, models 106A3, 106E2, and 106A2-K For use in performing cardiac ablation procedures.
  • Z-1452-06 · Aug 4, 2006 · Terminated
    7F Freezor Cardiac Cryoablation catheter, REF # 207F1. CryoCath Technologies Inc.

Other Cardiac ablation percutaneous catheter devices

All Cardiac ablation percutaneous catheter devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.