MVP™ MVP-3Q (UDI 00763000307745)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · PLUG MVP-3Q MICRO VASCULAR · Class 2 · Implant
All models of MVP (13)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00763000307745), received between Jan 12, 2022 and Jan 12, 2022 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 12, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE A 3Q MICROVASCULAR PLUG DURING PROCEDURE. THE MVP PLUG WAS SOAKED IN HEPARINIZED SALINE PRIOR TO USE. THE CATHETER WAS FLUSHED BEFORE INSERTING THE PLUG. A 0.027" MICROCATHETER WAS USED FOR DELIVERY. THE TARGET VESSEL DIAMETER WAS 1.5-2.0 MM. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE FELT WHILE ADVANCING THE PLUG THROUGH THE INTRODUCER SHEATH OR CATHETER. THE DELIVERY WIRE WAS NOT MANIPULATED OR ROTATED BEFORE OR DURING THE DELIVERY OF THE PLUG THROUGH THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO KINK OR DEFORMATION NOTED ON THE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO STRUT FRACTURE OBSERVED. THE USER DID NOT ROTATE THE TORQUER IN THE INCORRECT DIRECTION ACCIDENTALLY DURING PREP. IT IS REPORTED THE MVP PLUG WAS DISLODGED INSIDE MICROCATHETER. PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE PLUG WIRE TO POSITION IT BETTER BUT REALIZED THAT THE MVP PLUG WAS DISLODGED INSIDE MICROCATHETER. HENCE HE REMOVED THE WHOLE MICROCATHETER OUT FROM PATIENT AND RETRIEVED THE PLUG OUT USING A WIRE. THE DEVICE WAS SAFELY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH COILS. NO INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13236585 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page