Axium Prime Detachable Coil System APB-3.5-6-3D-ESRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL APB 3.5-6 3D-ES V06 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Axium Prime Detachable Coil System (70)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000313753), received between Sep 18, 2024 and Aug 22, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 22, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN AXIUM COIL THAT HAD RESISTANCE AT THE DISTAL END OF THE ECHELON 10 MICROCATHETER. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT A RIGHT POSTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (PCOM) UNRUPTURED SACCULAR ANEURYSM. THE ANEURYSM MAX DIAMETER WAS 4.67MM AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 3.28MM. PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL; VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MODERATE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER CONNECTING TO THE SYSTEM AND FULLY HYDRATING, THE AXIUM COIL WAS ADVANCED INTO THE ECHELON 10 MICROCATHETER. HOWEVER, RESISTANCE WAS FELT WITH THE COIL IN THE DISTAL END OF THE MICROCATHETER. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO REDUCE TENSION IN THE MICROCATHETER TO CONTINUE COIL DELIVERY BUT IT DID NOT RESOLVE THE ISSUE. IT WAS THEN ALSO A STRUGGLE TO WITHDRAW THE COIL SMOOTHLY FROM THE MICROCATHETER. THE COIL WAS REPLACED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22874660 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT AN AXIUM COIL ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE AND WAS STUCK IN THE SHEATH. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE AN ECHELON MICROCATHETER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE CAUSE OF THE RESISTANCE WAS NOT DETERMINED. A CONTINUOUS SALINE FLUSH HAD BEEN ADMINISTERED AND MAINTAINED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THE INTRODUCER SHEATH WAS HELD VERTICALLY WHEN THE IMPLANT COIL WAS PULLED BACK INSIDE DURING HYDRATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22512091 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2024Stretched; Stretched
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT AN AXIUM COIL WAS STRETCHED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF AN AMORPHOUS, UNRUPTURED ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY ANEURYSM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 4MM AND A 3MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION, AFTER THE MICROCATHETER WAS IN PLACE, AND THE APB-3.5-6-3D-ES WAS DELIVERED FOR FILLING. DURING THE ADJUSTMENT PROCESS, THE COIL WAS FOUND TO BE STRETCHED, SO IT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW COIL TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING TESTING OR DELIVERY. CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN REPOSITIONED THE COIL 2 TIMES DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE REPORTED DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE AN ECHELON MICROCATHETER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THERE WERE NO ISSUES THAT RESULTED IN THE DAMAGE THAT WAS FOUND.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20249592 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page