Skip to content

Axium Prime Detachable Coil System APB-3.5-10-3D-ESRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL APB 3.5-10 3D-ES V06 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Axium Prime Detachable Coil System (70)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000313777), received between Jul 1, 2025 and Jun 5, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Physical Resistance/Sticking2
  • Stretched1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT TWO AXIUM COILS ENCOUNTERED RESISTANCE/WERE STUCK IN THE SHEATH. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A GRITTY FEEL WHILE PUSHING 1-2CM OF THE COILS INSIDE THE PLASTIC SHEATH INTRODUCER. THE COILS DID NOT COME OUT OF THE SHEATHS SMOOTHLY. THE REPORTED DEVICES AND ANY ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE CONTRIBUTING FACTOR OF THE RESISTANCE WAS THAT THE DEVICE WAS STUCK ON THE PLASTIC COIL INTRODUCER. ADDITIONALLY, CONTINUOUS SALINE FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU AND DURING PREPARATION THE INTRODUCER SHEATH WAS LAID HORIZONTALITY FLAT IN THE TABLE. ALL INFORMATION WAS CONFIRMED BY THE PHYSICIAN.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25411448 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 1, 2025Stretched; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Stretched; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING AN AXIUM COIL THAT HAD RESISTANCE DURING DELIVERY IN THE ECHELON 10 MICROCATHETER AND BECAME DAMAGED/STRETCHED. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A COIL EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE TO TREAT A BASILARY ARTERY APEX RUPTURED SACCULAR ANEURYSM. THE ANEURYSM MAX DIAMETER WAS 4.2MM AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 3.6MM. BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL. VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MINIMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE AXIUM COIL AND ALL ACCESSORY DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). DURING DELIVERY, THE AXIUM COIL WAS STUCK AT THE DISTAL SEGMENT OF THE ECHELON 10 MICROCATHETER. THE COIL WAS STRETCHED. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THE CATHETER. THE COIL WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO HARM OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE COIL CAME OUT OF THE INTRODUCER SHEATH SMOOTHLY. A CONTINUOUS SALINE FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED AND MAINTAINED DURING THE PROCEDURE PER THE IFU. THE CAUSE OF THE RESISTANCE WAS NOT DETERMINED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22377237 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page