Skip to content

Axium Prime Detachable Coil System APB-3-4-HX-ESRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL APB 3-4 HX-ES V06 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Axium Prime Detachable Coil System (70)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000313951), received between Jan 6, 2025 and Jan 2, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Unintended Movement1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Hemorrhagic Stroke1
  • Ruptured Aneurysm1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 2, 2026Unintended Movement

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED. THE CAUSE OF THE CATHETER DISPLACEMENT WAS DETERMINED TO BE TENSION IN THE MICROCATHETER. THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT TENSION BECAUSE, UPON REACHING THE ANEURYSM WITH THE COIL, THE SYSTEM FELT SO RIGID THAT THE COIL WOULD NOT DEPLOY WITHIN THE ANEURYSM, GENERATING TENSION. DURING THE INITIAL ASCENT, NO FRICTION WAS FELT; THE TENSION WAS EXPERIENCED WHEN THE COIL REACHED THE DISTAL SEGMENT.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhagic Stroke; Ruptured Aneurysm

    MAUDE report 23945405 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 9, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT DURING ANEURYSM EMBOLIZATION, WHILE ADJUSTING THE POSITION OF THE COIL INSIDE THE ANEURYSM, THE COIL WAS WITHDRAWN OUT OF THE ANEURYSM. WHEN IT REACHED THE PROXIMAL SEGMENT OF THE MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY, THE COIL DETACHED AUTOMATICALLY. THE COIL WAS THEN RETRIEVED AND REMOVED FROM THE BODY USING A GUIDEWIRE AND SNARE. IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PROXIMAL DETACHMENT POINT WAS NOT KINKED, INDICATING THAT THE DETACHMENT WAS NOT DUE TO OPERATOR ERROR. A NEW COIL WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE AND ANY ACCESSORIES WERE PREPARED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL OR MEDICINAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PUSHWIRE WAS NOT BENT OR BROKEN. THERE WAS NO FRICTION OR DIFFICULTY DURING DELIVERY. THERE WAS COIL PREMATURE DETACHMENT. THE IMPLANT COIL WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE BODY USING A GUIDEWIRE AND SNARE. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, UNRUPTURED MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY (MCA) ANEURYSM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 3.5 MM AND A 2.2 MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESS

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23764549 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 6, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT A CONTINUOUS SALINE FLUSH WAS ADMINISTERED AND MAINTAINED AS INDICATED IN THE IFU. THE CAUSE OF THE RESISTANCE WAS NOT DETERMINED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21079724 ↗

Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices

All DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page