RistTM 106F-071-95Recalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · CATH RADIAL GUIDE 106F-071-95 V01 US · Class 2
All models of RistTM (3)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000541194), received between Sep 13, 2022 and Aug 4, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break7
- Material Deformation4
- Packaging Problem3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Stretched2
- Burst Container or Vessel1
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
- Vasoconstriction4
- Foreign Body In Patient3
- Headache2
- Bacterial Infection1
- Blurred Vision1
- Ischemia1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 4, 2026Break; Difficult to Remove
Medtronic received a report that when the Hospital / lab was done with stroke treatment and trying to remove the RIST catheter, it fractured. A Vascular Surgeon tried pulling it out from the wrist but it did not work. The interventional team went through the groin and tried to snare the RIST but this also did not work. The distal tip of the RIST broke off from the catheter. The RIST catheter remains in the patient.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Vasoconstriction
MAUDE report 50126702 ↗MalfunctionMay 22, 2026Material Deformation; Packaging Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT A RIST CATHETER WAS DAMAGED OUT OF PACKAGING. A KINK WAS OBSERVED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE DAMAGE WAS ON THE PACKAGED INTRODUCER GUIDE. THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS DETERMINED TO BE KINKED UPON DELIVERY. ALL INFORMATION HAD BEEN CONFIRMED/PROVIDED BY THE PHYSICIAN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED. FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25257696 ↗InjuryDec 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT A PATIENT TREATED WITH A PED2 PIPELINE STENT HAD A HEADACHE AND LIGHT SENSITIVITY AND VISION BECOMING BLURRY WITH BRIGHT LIGHT. INTERMITTENT FLASHES OF LIGHTS IN THE PERIPHERAL VISION-MAINLY ON THE LEFT SIDE. STATES SHE HAS INTERMITTENT, DULL, ACHING FRONTAL HEADACHE. THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED. THE EVENT RESOLVED ON 2023-FEB-14. POSSIBLY DEVICE AND PROCEDURE RELATED. MRI WAS POSITIVE FOR T2 FLAIR AS WELL AS MULTIPLE SMALL SUBACUTE INFARCT POSSIBLE SUBACUTE ISCHEMIA. THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR AN ANEURYSM IN THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA), C6 SEGMENT. LOCATION OF ANEURYSM IN VESSEL: SIDEWALL. ANEURYSM MORPHOLOGY: SACCULAR. MAXIMUM ANEURYSM DIAMETER: 8.5MM. ANEURYSM DOME HEIGHT: 6MM. ANEURYSM DOME WIDTH: 5MM. ANEURYSM NECK SIZE: 3.8MM. PARENT ARTERY DIAMETER DISTAL TO ANEURYSM: 3.2MM. PARENT ARTERY DIAMETER PROXIMAL TO ANEURYSM: 3.7MM. NO STASIS AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE. COMPLETE NECK COVERAGE AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE. RAYMOND AND ROY OCCLUSION CLASS 3 AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE. ACCESS VIA RADIAL RIGHT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED FROM FEBRUARY (B)(6) 2023. THE PATIENT WAS GIVEN ATORVAS
Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Headache; Ischemia; Stroke/CVA; Visual Disturbances
MAUDE report 23795282 ↗MalfunctionOct 20, 2025Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING A RIST CATHETER, IT WAS NOTICED THE HUB WAS BREAKING WHEN THE TECHNICAL WAS ABOUT TO LOAD THE NON-MEDTRONIC CATHETER BACK INTO THE RIST. THERE WERE NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EVENT, AND THE PATIENT OUTCOME WAS REPORTED AS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE BREAKING WAS COMPLETELY AT THE HUB WHERE THERE WAS SEPARATION. THE PHYSICIAN JUST TRIED TO USED THE CATHETER IT JUST BROKE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23342270 ↗InjuryApr 3, 2025Break; Stretched; Break; Stretched
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED THE ANTISPASMODIC MEDICATION PRIOR TO INSERTION OF THE RIST CATHETER.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Vasoconstriction
MAUDE report 21765506 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2025Break; Packaging Problem; Break; Packaging Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HUB WAS NOT ATTACHED TO THE CATHETER FOR THE CATHETER RADIAL GUIDE 106F-071-95. THIS ISSUE OCCURRED TWICE WHEN THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE 6F RIST CATHETER FROM THE PACKAGING AND NOTICED THE HUB WAS NOT ATTACHED. THE PHYSICIAN DISCARDED THE FIRST UNIT, OPENED ANOTHER FROM THE SAME LOT, AND ENCOUNTERED THE SAME ISSUE. NEITHER DEVICE WAS USED IN THE PROCEDURE, AND THE PHYSICIAN OPTED TO UTILIZE A COMPETITIVE GUIDE SHEATH TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THERE WAS NO DAMAGE OR EVIDENCE OF TAMPERING TO DEVICE PACKAGING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21713469 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2025Break; Packaging Problem; Break; Packaging Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HUB WAS NOT ATTACHED TO THE CATHETER FOR THE CATHETER RADIAL GUIDE 106F-071-95. THIS ISSUE OCCURRED TWICE WHEN THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE 6F RIST CATHETER FROM THE PACKAGING AND NOTICED THE HUB WAS NOT ATTACHED. THE PHYSICIAN DISCARDED THE FIRST UNIT, OPENED ANOTHER FROM THE SAME LOT, AND ENCOUNTERED THE SAME ISSUE. NEITHER DEVICE WAS USED IN THE PROCEDURE, AND THE PHYSICIAN OPTED TO UTILIZE A COMPETITIVE GUIDE SHEATH TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT THERE WAS NO DAMAGE OR EVIDENCE OF TAMPERING TO DEVICE PACKAGING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21713453 ↗InjuryJan 30, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED REPORTING THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT WAS NOT DETERMINED. THIS INFORMATION HAS BEEN CONFIRMED WITH THE PHYSICIAN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED REPORTING THE ADVERSE EVENT (AE) WAS NOT RELATED TO THE DISEASE UNDER STUDY. THE SITE ASSESSED THIS EVENT AS NOT RELATED TO ANTIPLATELET MEDICATION OR DEVICE AND POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE STUDY PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Headache; Pain; Vasoconstriction
MAUDE report 21273193 ↗MalfunctionDec 7, 2023Break; Stretched; Material Deformation; Break; Stretched; Material Deformation
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING A MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY (MMA) EMBOLIZATION. THE PATIENT'S VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS MINIMAL. THE CATHETER BROKE IN THE MIDDLE SECTION. THE CATHETER DID NOT SEPARATE INTO MULTIPLE PIECES. THE CATHETER BROKE UPON REMOVAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18287476 ↗InjurySep 13, 2022Break; Burst Container or Vessel; Material Deformation; Break; Burst Container or Vessel; Material Deformation
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT A RIST CATHETER SEPARATED IN THE DISTAL SECTION DUE TO ENTRAPMENT IN ONYX. THE PHYSICIAN WENT RADIAL FOR THE INTERVENTION WITH 6F RIST 106F-071-95 AND IT ENDED UP KINKING AT THE ARCH. ONYX 18 WAS USED TO EMBOLIZE THE MIDDLE MENINGEAL ARTERY AND HEADWAY DUO WAS USED AS HIS MICROCATHETER. WHEN TRYING TO REMOVE THE HEADWAY DUO THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED IT WAS STUCK IN THE ONYX CAST AND AT THIS POINT HE DIDN'T REALIZE THAT RIST HAD KINKED. THE PHYSICIAN PULLED THE HEADWAY DUO SLIGHTLY AND LOCKED THE TOUEY IN HOPES THAT THE HEADWAY DUO WOULD RELEASE FROM THE ONYX CAST. HE DID THIS SEVERAL TIMES AND WHILE DOING THIS THE HEADWAY DUO FRACTURED AROUND THE MID BODY OF THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN PULLED OUT THE PROXIMAL HALF OF THE HEADWAY DUO AND THEN REMOVED RIST WHICH IS WHEN THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED RIST WAS KINKED. WITH THE DISTAL HALF OF HEADWAY DUO WAS STILL IN THE PATIENT THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO USE A MICROSNARE TO REMOVE IT FIRST FROM THE ONYX CAST AND THEN FROM THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED THE NEXT DAY. DISTAL PORTION OF HEADWAY DUO STUCK IN ONYX CAST AND MIDDLE PORTION POSSIBLY ENTRAPPED IN THE KINK OF RIST PER PHYSICIAN. THE CATHETER WAS ENTRAP
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Vasoconstriction
MAUDE report 15414435 ↗
Other Catheter, percutaneous devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page