COUGAR® XT CGRXT190HS (UDI 00763000570132)Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic, Inc. · GDWR CGRXT190HS COUGARXT 5PK 190 ST HY · Class 2
All models of COUGAR XT (7)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000570132), received between Nov 21, 2023 and Feb 13, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Device Damaged by Another Device1
- Entrapment of Device1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information2
- Cardiac Tamponade1
- Chest Pain1
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension1
- Perforation1
- Vascular Dissection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 13, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A CRT IMPLANTATION PROCEDURE THE PATIENT SUFFERED A TAMPONADE FROM A PERFORATION IN THE NON-TORTUOUS, NO N-CALCIFIED CORONARY SINUS (CS). THE LESION WAS NOT PRE-DILATED. RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. THE RV LEAD AND RA LEAD WERE SUCCESSFULLY POSITIONED. ALL MEASUREMENTS WERE WITHIN THE NORMAL RANGE. THE CS CAT HETER WAS FLUSHED AND ADEQUATELY PREPARED. A 0.035" NON-MEDTRONIC WIRE, A 6250VI-MP CATHETER AND AN AL1, 6F GUIDING CATHETER WERE ADVANCED TO THE CS. THE CS WAS PROBED WITH THE WIRE AND THE AL1, AND THE 6250VI-MP CATHETER WAS INTRODUCED OVER THE WIRE. CONTRAST MEDIUM WAS INJECTED TO CONFIRM THE POSITIONING. THE 6215 BALLOON CATHETER WAS THEN INTRODUCED TO VISUALIZE THE CS. THE 6215 BALLOON CATHETER WAS FLUSHED AND ADVANCED USING A COUGAR XT GUIDEWIRE OVER THE EXISTING CS CATHETER. THE COUGAR GUIDEWIRE WAS INSPECTED BEFORE USE AND PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES. THE WIRE TIP WAS NOT FORMED BY THE PHYSICIAN. AFTER ADVANCING THE 6215 BALLOON CATHETER, THE COUGAR XT GUIDEWIRE WAS REMOVED, AND THE 6215 BALLOON WAS INFLATED AFTER POSITIONING WAS CONFIRMED WITH CONTRAST MEDIUM. A CS VISUALIZATION W
Patient problems: Cardiac Tamponade; Chest Pain; Insufficient Information; Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension; Perforation; Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 21372280 ↗InjuryNov 21, 2023Entrapment of Device; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Damaged by Another Device; Entrapment of Device; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Damaged by Another Device
AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO USE ONE COUGAR GUIDEWIRE DURING A PROCEDURE TO TREAT A MODERATELY TORTUOUS, MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION WITH 80% STENOSIS IN THE DISTAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THE DEVICE WAS INSPECTED WITH NO ISSUES. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER IFU WITH NO ISSUES. THE WIRE TIP WAS FORMED BY THE PHYSICIAN. THE LESION WAS PRE-DILATED. THE DEVICE DID PASS THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. RESISTANCE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED WHEN ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS NOT USED. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE DETACHED INSIDE THE PATIENT. AFTER DEPLOYING TWO STENTS AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO REMOVE THE COUGAR WIRE FROM THE VESSEL. HOWEVER, RESISTANCE WAS NOTICED AND THE WIRE APPEARED TO GET TANGLED IN THE MORE DISTAL STENT. THE WIRE HAD BEEN PROLAPSED OVER IN THE DISTAL VESSEL WHILE STENTING, AND IT IS POSSIBLE THE LOOP FROM THE PROLAPSED WIRE CAUGHT A STENT STRUT UPON REMOVAL. THE WIRE WAS FRACTURED IN AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE WIRE FROM THE VESSEL. THE VESSEL WAS THEN RE-WIRED AND THE ENTIRE VESSEL WAS STENTED FROM 15MM DISTAL TO THE TWO ORIGINALLY DEPLOYED STENTS, ALL THE WAY TO THE OSTIUM OF THE RCA. THE PLAN WAS TO TRAP WHAT WAS POSSIBLY LEFT OF THE FRACTURED WIRE IN THE VES
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 18180193 ↗
Other Wire, guide, catheter devices
- HI-TORQUE BALANCE MIDDLEWEIGHT UNIVERSAL II 1009664Abbott Vascular Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER321 reports
- SYNCHRO 14 M00313010Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls220 reports
- PressureWire™ C12059Lightlab Imaging, Inc. · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER1 death296 reports
- SYNCHRO 2 M00326410Stryker Corporation · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER2 recalls155 reports
- ENROUTE .014" Guidewire 11686-01Silk Road Medical, Inc. · Wire, Guide, Catheter2 deaths228 reports
- ARROW IPN035915Teleflex Incorporated · WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER217 reports
- OmniWire Pressure guide wire 89185Philips Image Guided Therapy Corporation · Wire, Guide, Catheter1 recall1 death160 reports
- ARROW IPN055780Teleflex Incorporated · Wire, guide, catheter4 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page