Skip to content

MVP™ MVP-7Q (UDI 00763000702106)Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic, Inc. · PLUG MVP-7Q MICRO VASCULAR · Class 2 · Implant

All models of MVP (13)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000702106), received between Mar 27, 2024 and Feb 23, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Positioning Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 23, 2026Migration or Expulsion of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT EMBOLIZATION WAS PERFORMED USING AN MVP-3Q MICRO VASCULAR PLUG ON THE RIGHT HEPATIC ARTERY AND TWO ADDITIONAL MVP-7QS WERE USED FOR THE LEFT SIDE. THE EMBOLIZATION WAS CARRIED OUT IN COMBINATION WITH AN IMPLANTATION OF A CHEMOTHERAPY PUMP, TO SELECTIVELY TREAT LIVE TUMORS IN A PATIENT WITH A HISTORY OF CANCER. 2 DAYS POST-OP, ONE OF THE MVPS MIGRATED, WHICH RENDERED THE CHEMOTHERAPY PUMP NON-THERAPEUTIC AND NECESSITATED A NEW EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE. DURING THE REINTERVENTION, THE MIGRATED MVP DEVICE WAS REMOVED, COILS WERE ADDED, AND A NEW MVP-7Q DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE ALIVE WITH NO FURTHER PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 23-FEB-2026: THE MVP PLUG WAS SOAKED IN HEPARINIZED SALINE PRIOR TO USE. THE CATHETER WAS FLUSHED BEFORE INSE RTING THE PLUG. A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS MAINTAINED DURING THE PROCEDURE. SEVERAL DIFFERENT UNKNOWN SHEATHS HAVE BEEN TRIED UNTIL REACHING TARGET SITE. THE TARGET VESSEL DIAMETER WAS REPORTED AS 5.3MM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ANATOMY WAS DIFFICULT AND TORTUOUS TO REACH TARGET SITE. HOWEVER, LANDING ZONE WAS VERY STRAIGHT. THE PLUG DID FULLY OPEN IN THE TARGET VESSEL BEFORE DETACHING, INCLUDI

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24412580 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2026Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Positioning Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE PLUG MICRO VASCULAR MVP-7Q, THE MVP PLUG COULD NOT DETACH AS INTENDED DESPITE MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO ROTATE IT ANTICLOCKWISE. AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, THE PLUG DETACHED FROM THE DELIVERING WIRE, BUT THE DELIVERING WIRE ACCIDENTALLY GOTTEN STUCK WITH THE PLUG. THE PLUG WAS THEN ACCIDENTALLY PULLED BACK AND FELL INTO THE ANEURYSM SAC. THE PLUG WAS RETRIEVED SUCCESSFULLY BY SNARE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A REPLACEMENT MVP PLUG OF THE SAME SIZE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24266183 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2024Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO USE AN MVP-7Q DEVICE DURING TREATMENT OF A 10MM LESION THE PATIENT¿S LEFT MID PULMONARY ARTERY. MODERATE VESSEL TORTUOSITY AND MINIMAL VESSEL CALCIFICATION WERE REPORTED. LESION EXHIBITED NO STENOSIS. ARTERY DIAMETER REPORTED AS 5.5MM. THERE WERE NO ABNORMALITIES REPORTED IN RELATION TO ANATOMY. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO PACKAGING, I.E. SHELF CARTON, HOOP/TRAY. THERE WERE NO ISSUES NOTED WHEN REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE HOOP TRAY. THE IFU (INSTRUCTION FOR USE) WAS FOLLOWED DURING PREPARATION, PROCEDURE, POST-PROCEDURE WITHOUT ISSUE. THE MVP PLUG WAS SOAKED IN HEPARINIZED SALINE PRIOR TO USE. THE CATHETER WAS FLUSHED BEFORE INSERTING THE PLUG. A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS NOT MAINTAINED DURING THE PROCEDURE AS THE PATIENT WAS AN INFANT. THE DEVICE WAS NOT PASSED THROUGH A PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED STENT. THE INNER DIAMETER SIZE OF CATHETER USED FOR DELIVERY WAS 6F. IT WAS REPORTED THE MVP DETACHED IN THE DELIVERY CATHETER. REMOVAL DIFFICULTIES WERE ALSO REPORTED.  NO VESSEL DAMAGE REPORTED. THE DEVICE WAS SAFELY REMOVED FROM PATIENT. A REPLACEMENT MVP-7Q WAS USED TO COMPLETE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18985594 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page