Axium™ Detachable Coil System QC-3-6-3DRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL QC-3-6-3D V14 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Axium Detachable Coil System (69)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00763000845797), received between Mar 5, 2026 and Mar 5, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- Intracranial Hemorrhage1
- Ruptured Aneurysm1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 5, 2026Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT DURING THE PROCEDURE THE AXIUM COIL WOULD NOT DETACH. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF A SACCULAR, RUPTURED ANTERIOR COMMUNICATING ARTERY (ACOM) ANEURYSM WITH A MAX DIAMETER OF 2.4 MM AND A 1.5 MM NECK DIAMETER. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW WAS NORMAL AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WAS SEVERE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR A SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE FROM AN ACOM ANEURYSM. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE COIL WAS SEATED PROPERLY IN THE ANEURYSM WITHOUT ANY TROUBLE, HOWEVER, IT WOULD NOT DETACH USING THE DETACHER. THE COIL WAS MANUALLY BROKEN AT THE DETACHMENT ZONE, HOWEVER, WOULD NOT ACTUALLY DETACH. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO PULL THE ENTIRE COIL INTO THE SL 10 CATHETER, HOWEVER, ONCE IT WAS IN THE CATHETER IT DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO PULL THE CATHETER WITH THE COIL INSIDE OUT OF THE PATIENT WITHOUT ANY TROUBLE. THE PATIENT¿S TORTUOSITY WAS NOTED AS SEVERE, HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT BEND OR USE EXCESSIVE PUSH TO GET THE COIL TO THE ANEURYSM. AFTER THE COIL AND CATHETER WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT, THE PATIENT RE-RUPTURED ON THE TABLE. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO GO BACK UP AND PLACE A FEW AXIO
Patient problems: Intracranial Hemorrhage; Ruptured Aneurysm
MAUDE report 24523666 ↗
Other DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION devices
- POD RBYPODJ60-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION355 reports
- Penumbra System SCH1Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION295 reports
- RUBY Coil RBY4C0860-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION276 reports
- Smart Coil 400SMTHXSFT0208Penumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION165 reports
- Penumbra System RH1-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION154 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0208CSS10Balt USA LLC · Device, Neurovascular Embolization3 recalls3 reports
- POD RBYPOD6-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION148 reports
- POD RBYPODJ30-APenumbra, Inc. · DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION132 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page