Axium™ Prime Detachable Coil System FC-7-20-3DRecalls & reported problems
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL FC-7-20-3D V14 · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Axium Prime Detachable Coil System (70)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000847586), received between Jan 9, 2026 and Jan 9, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Separation Failure2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 9, 2026Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE 3 AXIUM COILS COULD NOT BE DETACHED AN ANOTHER COIL BECAME STUCK IN THE PHENOM 17 MICROCATHETER. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR AN UNRUPTURED, SPINDLE-SHAPED ANEURYSM LOCATED IN THE BA-TOP. THE MAX DIAMETER WAS 10MM, AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 7MM. THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WERE NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DETACHMENT FAILURE OCCURRED WITH THE THIRD COIL EMBOLIZATION. THREE COILS EXPERIENCED NON-DETACHMENT. DETACHMENT WAS ATTEMPTED 5 TO 6 TIMES BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. SUBSEQUENTLY, DETACHMENT WAS SUCCESSFUL AFTER SWITCHING TO A DIFFERENT DETACHER. THE FINAL COIL BECAME STUCK AND COULD NOT BE DELIVERED. FLUSHING WAS ATTEMPTED, BUT THE ISSUE WAS NOT RESOLVED. USE OF A DIFFERENT PRODUCT RESULTED IN NO PROBLEMS. THE RESISTANCE WAS IN THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE CATHETER. THE COIL HAD PUSHED OUT SMOOTHLY FROM THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE COIL OR CATHETER. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY HEALTH DAMAGE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A SOFIA 6FR GUIDE CATHETER AND CHICANE NEXUS GUIDEWIRE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24028180 ↗MalfunctionJan 9, 2026Separation Failure
MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE 3 AXIUM COILS COULD NOT BE DETACHED AN ANOTHER COIL BECAME STUCK IN THE PHENOM 17 MICROCATHETER. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR AN UNRUPTURED, SPINDLE-SHAPED ANEURYSM LOCATED IN THE BA-TOP. THE MAX DIAMETER WAS 10MM, AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 7MM. THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WERE NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DETACHMENT FAILURE OCCURRED WITH THE THIRD COIL EMBOLIZATION. THREE COILS EXPERIENCED NON-DETACHMENT. DETACHMENT WAS ATTEMPTED 5 TO 6 TIMES BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. SUBSEQUENTLY, DETACHMENT WAS SUCCESSFUL AFTER SWITCHING TO A DIFFERENT DETACHER. THE FINAL COIL BECAME STUCK AND COULD NOT BE DELIVERED. FLUSHING WAS ATTEMPTED, BUT THE ISSUE WAS NOT RESOLVED. USE OF A DIFFERENT PRODUCT RESULTED IN NO PROBLEMS. THE RESISTANCE WAS IN THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE CATHETER. THE COIL HAD PUSHED OUT SMOOTHLY FROM THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE COIL OR CATHETER. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY HEALTH DAMAGE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A SOFIA 6FR GUIDE CATHETER AND CHICANE NEXUS GUIDEWIRE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24028151 ↗
Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices
- POD RBYPOD8-APenumbra, Inc. · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization195 reports
- CEREPAKTM MDH1Cerenovus, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization1 recall72 reports
- Azur CX Detachable 45-750824Microvention, Inc. · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization115 reports
- Tornado G08261Cook Incorporated · Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization2 recalls7 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0930CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0720CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls4 reports
- Prestige Coil System PRES0520HPKPLBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
- Optima Coil System OPTI0413CSFMXBalt USA LLC · Device, Vascular, For Promoting Embolization2 recalls3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page