Skip to content

Axium™ Prime Detachable Coil System FC-7-20-3DRecalls & reported problems

Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · COIL FC-7-20-3D V14 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Axium Prime Detachable Coil System (70)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00763000847586), received between Jan 9, 2026 and Jan 9, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Separation Failure” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 2 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Separation Failure2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2026Separation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE 3 AXIUM COILS COULD NOT BE DETACHED AN ANOTHER COIL BECAME STUCK IN THE PHENOM 17 MICROCATHETER. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR AN UNRUPTURED, SPINDLE-SHAPED ANEURYSM LOCATED IN THE BA-TOP. THE MAX DIAMETER WAS 10MM, AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 7MM. THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WERE NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DETACHMENT FAILURE OCCURRED WITH THE THIRD COIL EMBOLIZATION. THREE COILS EXPERIENCED NON-DETACHMENT. DETACHMENT WAS ATTEMPTED 5 TO 6 TIMES BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. SUBSEQUENTLY, DETACHMENT WAS SUCCESSFUL AFTER SWITCHING TO A DIFFERENT DETACHER. THE FINAL COIL BECAME STUCK AND COULD NOT BE DELIVERED. FLUSHING WAS ATTEMPTED, BUT THE ISSUE WAS NOT RESOLVED. USE OF A DIFFERENT PRODUCT RESULTED IN NO PROBLEMS. THE RESISTANCE WAS IN THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE CATHETER. THE COIL HAD PUSHED OUT SMOOTHLY FROM THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE COIL OR CATHETER. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY HEALTH DAMAGE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A SOFIA 6FR GUIDE CATHETER AND CHICANE NEXUS GUIDEWIRE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24028180 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2026Separation Failure

    MEDTRONIC RECEIVED A REPORT THAT THE 3 AXIUM COILS COULD NOT BE DETACHED AN ANOTHER COIL BECAME STUCK IN THE PHENOM 17 MICROCATHETER. THE PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING TREATMENT FOR AN UNRUPTURED, SPINDLE-SHAPED ANEURYSM LOCATED IN THE BA-TOP. THE MAX DIAMETER WAS 10MM, AND THE NECK DIAMETER WAS 7MM. THE PATIENT'S BLOOD FLOW AND VESSEL TORTUOSITY WERE NORMAL. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DETACHMENT FAILURE OCCURRED WITH THE THIRD COIL EMBOLIZATION. THREE COILS EXPERIENCED NON-DETACHMENT. DETACHMENT WAS ATTEMPTED 5 TO 6 TIMES BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. SUBSEQUENTLY, DETACHMENT WAS SUCCESSFUL AFTER SWITCHING TO A DIFFERENT DETACHER. THE FINAL COIL BECAME STUCK AND COULD NOT BE DELIVERED. FLUSHING WAS ATTEMPTED, BUT THE ISSUE WAS NOT RESOLVED. USE OF A DIFFERENT PRODUCT RESULTED IN NO PROBLEMS. THE RESISTANCE WAS IN THE PROXIMAL PART OF THE CATHETER. THE COIL HAD PUSHED OUT SMOOTHLY FROM THE INTRODUCER SHEATH. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE TO THE COIL OR CATHETER. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY HEALTH DAMAGE. THE DEVICES WERE PREPARED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). ANCILLARY DEVICES INCLUDE A SOFIA 6FR GUIDE CATHETER AND CHICANE NEXUS GUIDEWIRE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24028151 ↗

Other Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices

All Device, Vascular, for Promoting Embolization devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page