NATURA 411803Recalls & reported problems
Convatec, Purchasing Department · SUR-FIT Natura® Moldable Stomahesive® Skin Barrier With Hydrocolloid Flexible Collar [45Mm (1 3/4" ) - Medium] · Class 1
Quick summary
This Convatec SUR-FIT Natura skin barrier is a moldable wafer worn around an ostomy opening. Of the 161 reports, all are malfunctions, and most describe a starter hole that is off-center, making some wafers unusable. The reports include no deaths or injuries. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 161
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 161 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00768455105977), received between Apr 10, 2019 and Jun 15, 2026 — classified as 161 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (157 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Malposition of Device157
- Positioning Problem14
- Material Too Rigid or Stiff3
- Material Disintegration2
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient80
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions64
- No Patient Involvement17
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 161 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT SIX UNITS WERE UNUSABLE DUE TO AN OFF-CENTER STARTER HOLE, WHILE FOUR UNITS FROM THE SAME BOX WERE USABLE WITH MINOR DEVIATION. WHEN PROPERLY CENTERED, THE DEVICE ACHIEVED EXPECTED PERFORMANCE (UP TO 5 DAYS WEAR TIME). THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25505917 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT SIX UNITS WERE UNUSABLE DUE TO AN OFF-CENTER STARTER HOLE, WHILE FOUR UNITS FROM THE SAME BOX WERE USABLE WITH MINOR DEVIATION. WHEN PROPERLY CENTERED, THE DEVICE ACHIEVED EXPECTED PERFORMANCE (UP TO 5 DAYS WEAR TIME). THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25505915 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT SIX UNITS WERE UNUSABLE DUE TO AN OFF-CENTER STARTER HOLE, WHILE FOUR UNITS FROM THE SAME BOX WERE USABLE WITH MINOR DEVIATION. WHEN PROPERLY CENTERED, THE DEVICE ACHIEVED EXPECTED PERFORMANCE (UP TO 5 DAYS WEAR TIME). THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25505914 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT SIX UNITS WERE UNUSABLE DUE TO AN OFF-CENTER STARTER HOLE, WHILE FOUR UNITS FROM THE SAME BOX WERE USABLE WITH MINOR DEVIATION. WHEN PROPERLY CENTERED, THE DEVICE ACHIEVED EXPECTED PERFORMANCE (UP TO 5 DAYS WEAR TIME). THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25505913 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT SIX UNITS WERE UNUSABLE DUE TO AN OFF-CENTER STARTER HOLE, WHILE FOUR UNITS FROM THE SAME BOX WERE USABLE WITH MINOR DEVIATION. WHEN PROPERLY CENTERED, THE DEVICE ACHIEVED EXPECTED PERFORMANCE (UP TO 5 DAYS WEAR TIME). THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25505910 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT SIX UNITS WERE UNUSABLE DUE TO AN OFF-CENTER STARTER HOLE, WHILE FOUR UNITS FROM THE SAME BOX WERE USABLE WITH MINOR DEVIATION. WHEN PROPERLY CENTERED, THE DEVICE ACHIEVED EXPECTED PERFORMANCE (UP TO 5 DAYS WEAR TIME). THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25505908 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389332 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389331 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389330 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389329 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389327 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389322 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389238 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389237 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389234 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2026Malposition of Device
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT OPENINGS IN THE BOX WERE OFF-CENTERED. HE STATED THAT ALL TEN WAFERS IN THE BOX WERE AFFECTED AND NOTED THAT THIS BOX HAD BEEN PROVIDED AS A REPLACEMENT FOR THE SAME ISSUE REPORTED IN A PREVIOUS COMPLAINT. THE CUSTOMER INDICATED THAT THE OPENINGS IN ALL WAFERS WERE MISALIGNED, WITH SOME MORE NOTICEABLY OFF-CENTER THAN OTHERS, RENDERING SEVERAL WAFERS COMPLETELY UNUSABLE FOR HIM. HE CONFIRMED THAT HE HAD NOT USED ANY WAFERS FROM THIS BOX. HE FURTHER EXPLAINED THAT WHEN HE HAD PREVIOUSLY USED PRODUCTS WITH THIS ISSUE, HE HAD BEEN UNABLE TO ACHIEVE A PROPER SEAL. HE EMPHASIZED THAT AN EVENLY CENTERED OPENING WAS CRUCIAL FOR HIM DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF A PARASTOMAL HERNIA. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25389228 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Malposition of Device
THE END USER REPORTED THAT THE OPENING IN THE EIGHT MOLDABLE SKIN BARRIERS WERE OFF CENTERED WHICH MADE THE SKIN BARRIER UNUSABLE. CONSUMER WAS A LONG-TIME USER OF THIS PRODUCT; TYPICAL WEAR TIME WAS FIVE DAYS. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25240886 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Malposition of Device
THE END USER REPORTED THAT THE OPENING IN THE EIGHT MOLDABLE SKIN BARRIERS WERE OFF CENTERED WHICH MADE THE SKIN BARRIER UNUSABLE. CONSUMER WAS A LONG-TIME USER OF THIS PRODUCT; TYPICAL WEAR TIME WAS FIVE DAYS. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25240885 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Malposition of Device
THE END USER REPORTED THAT THE OPENING IN THE EIGHT MOLDABLE SKIN BARRIERS WERE OFF CENTERED WHICH MADE THE SKIN BARRIER UNUSABLE. CONSUMER WAS A LONG-TIME USER OF THIS PRODUCT; TYPICAL WEAR TIME WAS FIVE DAYS. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25240884 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Malposition of Device
THE END USER REPORTED THAT THE OPENING IN THE EIGHT MOLDABLE SKIN BARRIERS WERE OFF CENTERED WHICH MADE THE SKIN BARRIER UNUSABLE. CONSUMER WAS A LONG-TIME USER OF THIS PRODUCT; TYPICAL WEAR TIME WAS FIVE DAYS. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25240883 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Malposition of Device
THE END USER REPORTED THAT THE OPENING IN THE EIGHT MOLDABLE SKIN BARRIERS WERE OFF CENTERED WHICH MADE THE SKIN BARRIER UNUSABLE. CONSUMER WAS A LONG-TIME USER OF THIS PRODUCT; TYPICAL WEAR TIME WAS FIVE DAYS. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25240882 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Malposition of Device
THE END USER REPORTED THAT THE OPENING IN THE EIGHT MOLDABLE SKIN BARRIERS WERE OFF CENTERED WHICH MADE THE SKIN BARRIER UNUSABLE. CONSUMER WAS A LONG-TIME USER OF THIS PRODUCT; TYPICAL WEAR TIME WAS FIVE DAYS. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25240881 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Malposition of Device
THE END USER REPORTED THAT THE OPENING IN THE EIGHT MOLDABLE SKIN BARRIERS WERE OFF CENTERED WHICH MADE THE SKIN BARRIER UNUSABLE. CONSUMER WAS A LONG-TIME USER OF THIS PRODUCT; TYPICAL WEAR TIME WAS FIVE DAYS. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25240880 ↗MalfunctionMay 21, 2026Malposition of Device
THE END USER REPORTED THAT THE OPENING IN THE EIGHT MOLDABLE SKIN BARRIERS WERE OFF CENTERED WHICH MADE THE SKIN BARRIER UNUSABLE. CONSUMER WAS A LONG-TIME USER OF THIS PRODUCT; TYPICAL WEAR TIME WAS FIVE DAYS. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25240879 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2025Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED THAT THE EDGE OF THE CENTRAL HOLE OF MOLDABLE WAFERS WAS NOT REGULAR, AND THE GLUE OVERFLOWED. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED BY THE END USER. THE PHOTOGRAPHS DEPICTING THE ISSUE WERE RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21332703 ↗
Other PROTECTOR, OSTOMY devices
- NATURA 404593Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY2,403 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413182Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY1,202 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413180Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY1,190 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413179Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY1,178 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413181Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY974 reports
- NATURA 411802Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY966 reports
- NATURA 404592Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY907 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413183Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY773 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.