SUR-FIT NATURA 421041Recalls & reported problems
Convatec, Purchasing Department · Natura Moldable Durahesive Skin Barrier - Accordion Flange With Hydrocolloid Flexible Collar 33-45Mm · Class 1
All models of SUR-FIT NATURA (43)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This is a Convatec Natura Moldable Durahesive skin barrier, an accordion-flange ostomy skin protector worn around a stoma. The 32 reports mostly describe the wafer sitting or shifting out of position and being stiffer or harder to mold than usual, with a few reports of redness, swelling, or skin inflammation. There are 31 malfunctions, 1 injury, and no deaths. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 32
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 32 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00768455133215), received between Feb 15, 2019 and Jul 7, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 31 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Malposition of Device” (22 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Malposition of Device22
- Material Too Rigid or Stiff9
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
Patient problems
- No Patient Involvement12
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient10
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions9
- Arthralgia1
- Erythema1
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
- Inflammation1
- Skin Inflammation/ Irritation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 32 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409720 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409719 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409718 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409715 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409712 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409709 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409669 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409668 ↗MalfunctionJul 7, 2025Material Too Rigid or Stiff; Material Too Rigid or Stiff
THE CONSUMER REPORTED THAT THE NINE MOLDABLE WAFERS FROM ONE MARKET UNIT WAS STIFFER AND LESS PLIABLE THAN USUAL, MAKING IT DIFFICULT TO MOLD AND KEEP IN PLACE. ALTHOUGH WEAR TIME REMAINED UNAFFECTED (TYPICALLY THREE TO FOUR DAYS), SHE NOTICED A DIFFERENCE IN THE ADHESIVE'S FEEL. THE STOMA SIZE AND CONTOURS WERE UNCHANGED, WITH THE STOMA AT THE PRODUCT'S MAXIMUM MOLD-TO-FIT SIZE OF FORTY-FIVE MILLIMETER (MM). THERE WAS NO HARM REPORTED. SHE BEGAN USING A NEW MARKET UNIT AND FOUND ITS FLEXIBILITY AND MOLDABILITY TO BE AS EXPECTED. NO PHOTO OR FURTHER INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22409664 ↗InjuryOct 12, 2023Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: Arthralgia; Erythema; Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Inflammation; Skin Inflammation/ Irritation; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 17923327 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WAFER HAD AN OFF CENTERED STARTER HOLE. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED ON PATIENT. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10117617 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WAFER HAD AN OFF CENTERED STARTER HOLE. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED ON PATIENT. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10117609 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WAFER HAD AN OFF-CENTERED STARTER HOLE. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED ON PATIENT. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10117589 ↗MalfunctionJun 4, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WAFER HAD AN OFF-CENTERED STARTER HOLE. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED ON PATIENT. A PHOTOGRAPH DEPICTING THE ISSUE WAS RECEIVED FROM THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10117588 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9961656 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9961655 ↗MalfunctionApr 13, 2020Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9952037 ↗MalfunctionNov 12, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9313384 ↗MalfunctionSep 30, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9135202 ↗MalfunctionSep 30, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9134603 ↗MalfunctionSep 30, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9134550 ↗MalfunctionSep 30, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9134384 ↗MalfunctionSep 23, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THE WAFER HAD OFF CENTERED STARTER HOLE. PHOTOS DEPICTING THE REPORTED COMPLAINT ISSUE WERE PROVIDED BY THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9105813 ↗MalfunctionSep 23, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THE WAFER HAD OFF CENTERED STARTER HOLE. PHOTOS DEPICTING THE REPORTED COMPLAINT ISSUE WERE PROVIDED BY THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9105382 ↗MalfunctionSep 23, 2019Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THE WAFER HAD OFF CENTERED STARTER HOLE. PHOTOS DEPICTING THE REPORTED COMPLAINT ISSUE WERE PROVIDED BY THE COMPLAINANT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9105366 ↗
Other Protector, Ostomy devices
- NATURA 404593Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY2,403 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413182Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY1,202 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413180Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY1,190 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413179Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY1,178 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413181Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY974 reports
- NATURA 411802Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY966 reports
- NATURA 404592Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY907 reports
- SUR-FIT NATURA 413183Convatec, Purchasing Department · PROTECTOR, OSTOMY773 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page