Skip to content

GENTLECATH 510602Recalls & reported problems

Convatec, Purchasing Department · GENTLECATH AIR FEM V2.0 CH14 1X30PK US · Class 2

All models of GENTLECATH (8)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00768455204847), received between Aug 5, 2025 and Apr 8, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Handling Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device Handling Problem1

Patient problems

  • Urinary Tract Infection2
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 8, 2026Device Handling Problem

    END USER STATES SHE "WAS GIVEN SAMPLES OF OUR (B)(6) FR AND SHOWN HOW TO CIC AT UROLOGISTS OFFICE AND ADVISED PERFORMING CIC ONCE A DAY, AND AT NIGHT BEFORE BED DUE TO URINARY RETENTION, AS SHE HAS BEEN HAVING A WEAK STREAM FOR A WHILE NOW ESPECIALLY AT NIGHT. SHE SAID PREVIOUSLY IN HER LIFETIME (BEFORE EVEN STARTING CIC) SHE HAS HAD AROUND "5 OR SO" UTIS. SINCE SHE JUST STARTED CIC, THIS IS THE FIRST TIME SHE GOT A UTI WHICH STARTED JUST A FEW DAYS AFTER STARTING CIC. SHE REALLY ISN'T SURE WHERE THE UTI CAME FROM. SHE SAID AT HOME SHE STRUGGLED WITH FINDING THE RIGHT SPOT TO GET IT IN HER URETHRA WHEN SHE FIRST ATTEMPTED THIS AT HOME. SHE HAD TO USE SEVERAL TO FIGURE IT OUT AS "SHE PROBED AROUND A LOT" AND WAS A LITTLE SORE DOWN THERE FROM TRYING WITH THE CATHETER SAMPLES. SHE HAD TRIED TO USE A LIGHT ON THE FLOOR BUT IT WAS HARD FOR HER TO HOLD A MIRROR AT THE SAME TIME TO SEE HER URETERAL OPENING WELL. WHEN HER SUPPLIER CALLED HER TO SET HER UP WITH SUPPLIES, SHE RELAYED THIS STRUGGLE TO THEM AND THEY EVEN SENT HER A LEG MIRROR WHICH JUST ARRIVED YESTERDAY IN HER FIRST FULL ORDER. SHE SAID SHE WAS FINALLY, ACTUALLY, SUCCESSFUL PRIOR TO NEEDING TO USE IT. SHE SAID ON HER 4TH TIME

    Patient problems: Pain; Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 24817773 ↗
  • InjuryAug 5, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CONSUMER STATES "NO DEFECTS NOTED AT ALL WITH THE PRODUCT. SHE DID STATE SHE DID HAVE 2 UTIS WHILE USING IT BUT DID NOT FEEL IT WAS THE ONLY POSSIBLE CAUSE TO BLAME FOR HER UTIS, RATHER IT DID NOT WORK FOR HER ANATOMY TO FULLY DRAIN HER AS WELL COMPARED TO HER PRIOR CATHETER (THE INFYNA CHIC) AND THINKS THIS MAY HAVE LED TO THOSE UTIS WHILE USING THIS PRODUCT. CONSUMER STATES SHE IS ALMOST 80 YR OLD FEMALE CATHING FOR THE LAST YEAR, 2-3 TIMES A DAY. SHE STATES HER BLADDER LOOKS LIKE THE CRATERS OF THE MOON" HAS MULTIPLE DIVERTICULI, STATING SHE HAS MULTIPLE BLADDER AND PELVIC ISSUES. SHE REITERATED MULTIPLE TIMES ON OUR CALL SHE DID NOT FEEL THE CATH IS DEFECTED IT JUST DIDN'T WORK FOR HER AND IT JUST DIDN'T DRAIN HER AS FULLY AS HER OTHER CATHETER THUS POSSIBLY LEADING TO 2 UTIS." SHE WAS USED TO USING THE INFYNA CHIC CATHETER AND PER HER SUPPLIER "SHE TRIED THE GCAFW FOR ABOUT 2 MONTHS. SHE STATES SHE HAS ALWAYS GOTTEN RECURRENT UTI INFECTIONS, EVEN BEFORE TRIALING THIS GCAFW CATHETER. SHE WANTED TO GIVE IT A GOOD TRIAL RUN BUT DIDN'T FEEL IT WAS THE BEST ONE FOR HER. SHE SAID SHE FELT LIKE THIS ONE JUST DIDN'T DRAIN HER AS COMPLETELY AS THE INFYNA CHIC DID DESPITE BEING ABOUT TH

    Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection

    MAUDE report 22714038 ↗

Other Catheter, straight devices

All Catheter, straight devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page