Bardex® Lubricath® Foley Catheter Tray 899914Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bardex® Lubricath® Foley Catheter Tray · Class 2
All models of Bardex Lubricath Foley Catheter Tray (3)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741024801), received between Sep 18, 2017 and Sep 16, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Leak/Splash” (2 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jun 25, 2026Class IIOpen, Classified
Due to complaints received indicating presence of contamination on the surface of pericare wipes provided with various Foley and Intermittent Catheter Trays.
Z-3114-2026 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Leak/Splash2
- Component Missing1
- Fracture1
- Illegible Information1
- Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Urinary Tract Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 16, 2025Component Missing; Component Missing
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, GENITAL CLEANING BEGAN WITH A CLOSED-CIRCUIT 14FR BLADDER CATHETER, AND WHEN THE COVER WAS REMOVED, THE CATHETER WAS MISSING IN THE FOLEY TRAY. THIS OCCURRED DURING THE INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD. 14FR FOLEY CATHETER WITH A SEPARATE COLLECTION BAG WAS REQUESTED FROM THE SUB-CENTRAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23062386 ↗MalfunctionMay 7, 2022Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INDIVIDUAL PACKAGING BAG OF TWO PIECES OF THE PRODUCT WERE NOT SEALED LIKE THE OTHERS IN THE FOLEY TRAY. SINCE THE PRODUCTS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE STERILIZED AND THE BAGS WERE OPEN, THE PRODUCTS CANNOT BE USED IN HOSPITAL/PATIENTS DUE TO THE RISK OF CLINICAL COMPLICATIONS AND WERE KEPT AT DISTRIBUTOR'S WAREHOUSE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14316104 ↗MalfunctionApr 2, 2022Illegible Information; Illegible Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT NURSE DISCOVERED THAT THE FOLEY CATHETER KIT WHICH WAS ABOUT TO USE ON A PATIENT WAS MADE OF LATEX. STATED THAT THE NURSE DID NOT USE THIS PRODUCT ON THE PATIENT, BUT NOTABLY THE PACKAGING DID NOT IDENTIFY THAT THIS PRODUCT CONTAINED LATEX UNTIL AFTER THE STERILE PACKAGING WAS OPENED AND ONLY THEN IT WAS LISTED IN SMALL PRINT ON A PAPER PRODUCT INSERT. GIVEN THE PREVALENCE OF SERIOUS LATEX ALLERGIES, THIS PRODUCT DID NOT FEEL SAFE TO USE IN THE HOSPITAL. AND THERE WAS ANOTHER PRODUCT THEY FOUND THAT APPEARED TO HAVE IDENTICAL PACKAGING BUT WAS MADE OF SILICONE INSTEAD. THE FOLEY CATHETER KIT SEEMED SAFE FOR HOSPITAL USE, WHEREAS THE BARD LUBRICATH FOLEY CATHETER TRAY KIT CONTAINS LATEX. THE VISUAL APPEARANCE OF THE LATEX PACKAGE AND THE LATEX FREE PACKAGE WERE VERY SIMILAR, AND IT WAS EASY TO NOT NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE. IT WOULD BE MUCH BETTER IF THE PACKAGING WAS A DIFFERENT COLOR OR HAD A MUCH MORE PROMINENT LATEX WARNING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13992238 ↗InjuryOct 19, 2018Leak/Splash; Fracture; Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING URINE DRAINAGE, A FRACTURE WAS OBSERVED AT THE TUBING JUNCTION SEAL AND AT THE BASE OF THE COLLECTION BAG. THE PATIENT HAD A URINARY TRACT INFECTION AFTER THIS EVENT. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON (B)(6)2018 , THE PATIENT RECEIVED TREATMENT FOR THE URINARY TRACT INFECTION. THE TYPE OF MEDICATION IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 7987041 ↗MalfunctionSep 18, 2017Leak/Splash
IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON OPENING THE FOLEY TRAY, THE BETADINE FROM THE SWAB STICKS LEAKED INTO THE TRAY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6873459 ↗
Other CATHETER, COUDE devices
- Bardex® Lubricath® Foley Catheter 0165L14C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, COUDE562 reports
- Bardex® Lubricath® Foley Catheter 0165L16C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, COUDE539 reports
- Bardia® Foley Catheter Silicone Coated 123516AC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, COUDE381 reports
- Bardia® Foley Catheter Silicone Coated 123514AC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, COUDE195 reports
- SureStep™ Foley Tray System Bardex® Lubricath® Foley Catheter A899916C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, COUDE3 recalls19 reports
- Bardia® Foley Catheter Silicone Coated 123518AC. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, COUDE153 reports
- SureStep™ Foley Tray System Bardex® Lubricath® Foley Catheter A902916C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, COUDE2 recalls50 reports
- Bard® Lubricath® Foley Catheter 365716C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, COUDE117 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page