Skip to content

PowerPICC SOLO2 Catheter 3295135Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · PowerPICC SOLO Catheter 5F Radiology Basic Tray (Dual-Lumen) (135cm Guidewire) · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PowerPICC SOLO2 Catheter (20)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741028106), received between Feb 17, 2017 and Sep 2, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Backflow” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Backflow2
  • Material Deformation2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Failure to Infuse1
  • Flushing Problem1
  • Material Frayed1
  • Product Quality Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Air Embolism1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Muscle Weakness/Atrophy1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 2, 2026Backflow

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50573365 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 1, 2026Backflow

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50543393 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2026Product Quality Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: AIR EMBOLISM WAS TREATED WITH HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW MUCH AIR EMBOLIZED. PATIENT REPORTED RIGHT-SIDE WEAKNESS TO THE NURSE. NURSE ASSESSED THE PATIENT, GCS WAS E4M5V6, LIMB POWER OF RIGHT SIDE 2/5, LEFT SIDE 4/5, BILATERAL PUPIL SIZE 3MM, REACTIVE TO LIGHT. BLOOD PRESSURE: 101/72MMHG, PULSE: 89/MINUTES, SPO2: 94% IN ROOM AIR, TEMPERATURE: 36.6. PATIENT'S STATUS POST-TREATMENT WAS REQUESTED BUT NOT PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Air Embolism; Muscle Weakness/Atrophy

    MAUDE report 24378841 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 16, 2023Failure to Infuse; Failure to Infuse

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER PICC LINE PLACED APRIL 10TH ISSUES DEVELOPED WHERE PICC LINE PORT COULD NOT BE USED, UNABLE TO FLUSH AND ASPIRATE FROM RED PORT. ALTAPLASE WAS PUT IN LINE BUT IT DID NOT CLEAR THE LINE. NO APPARENT HARM, INCONVENIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 09-MAY-2023 : THE PICCS WERE BEING USED FOR IV THERAPY INCLUDING FLUID, ANTIBIOTICS AND NUTRITION. THE STAFF WERE TRYING TO FLUSH THE PICCS AS PER PROTOCOL. WE ATTEMPTED TO DEAL WITH THE PICCS USING ALTEPLASE, ANTIBIOTICS AND NUTRITION HELD. CAUSED A DELAY IN ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY AND NUTRITION. THERE WERE NO FURTHER SURGERIES, TESTS EXCEPT FOR PICC LINES NEEDING TO BE RETHREADED AND/OR REPLACED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16942700 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2022Material Frayed; Material Frayed

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE POWERPICC SOLO CATHETER WAS PLACED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE GUIDEWIRE CANNOT BE ADVANCED SMOOTHLY AND THEN IT WAS FOUND KINKED IN PATIENT. THE GUIDEWIRE CANNOT BE REMOVED SO THE RADIOLOGIST FORCEDLY REMOVED THE GUIDEWIRE FROM THE PEEL AWAY SHEATH INTRODUCER. PART OF GUIDEWIRE WAS BROKEN AND REMAINED IN PATIENT¿S BODY. THE REMAINING GUIDEWIRE WAS REMOVED UNDER USG. PATIENT STATUS/ INTERVENTION: THE PATIENTS HAVE SERIOUS SVC STENOSIS (OBSTRUCTION).

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 14117635 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2022Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE POWERPICC SOLO CATHETER WAS PLACED SMOOTHLY ON (B)(6) 2022. BUT THE CATHETER WAS FOUND KINKED WHEN REMOVED FROM PATIENT. PATIENT STATUS/ INTERVENTION: NO INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14115676 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 7, 2020Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    THE GUIDEWIRE WAS FOUND BENT DURING INSERTION AT X-RAY IN MID (B)(6) 2020. (B)(6) 2020- RETURNED GUIDEWIRE IS KINKED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10035607 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 3, 2019Flushing Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PICC WAS UNABLE TO BE FLUSHED FREELY ON BOTH LUMENS. NO OTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8759047 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 17, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER "ACCIDENTALLY" SLIPPED OUT AND WAS REMOVED BY THE DOCTOR.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6338913 ↗

Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices

All Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page