Skip to content

PowerPICC SOLO2 Catheter with Sherlock Tip Location System (TLS) Stylet 9295108Recalls & reported problems

Bard Access Systems, Inc. · DOT PowerPICC, Solo, · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741028649), received between Aug 17, 2018 and Oct 5, 2018 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Fitting Problem1
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 5, 2018Break; Fitting Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PICC PLACEMENT OCCURRED ON (B)(6) AND A WIRE FRAGMENT WAS FOUND UNDER X-RAY ON (B)(6). IT WAS STATED THERE WERE NO FRAGMENTS FOUND WITH THE INITIAL X-RAYS. FOUR DAYS LATER , FRAGMENTS OF A WIRE WERE FOUND UNDER X-RAY. THE WIRE WAS FOUND ZIG -ZAGGING UNDER THE PULMONARY ARTERY. IT WAS STATED THAT THE FACILITY IS NOT 100% SURE IF IT IS FROM THE PICC INSERTION SINCE THE PICC NURSE DIDN¿T OBSERVE ANYTHING UNUSUAL. ACCORDING TO THE PICC NURSE, THE PICC PROCEDURE WAS TYPICAL AND THE PATIENT WAS NOT CONSIDERED A DIFFICULT STICK. THE PATIENT WAS NOT IN ANY PAIN. THE FRAGMENT WAS NOT REMOVED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7939654 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 17, 2018Difficult to Remove; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO REMOVE AFTER AN ATTEMPT TO PLACE IT. IT WAS STATED ONCE THE PHYSICIAN HAD REMOVED IT, A KNOT IN THE CATHETER WAS NOTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7794749 ↗

Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices

All Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,long-term greater than 30 days devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page