Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 166820Recalls & reported problems
C. R. Bard, Inc. · Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 30cc Balloon · Class 2
All models of Bardex All-Silicone Foley Catheter (12)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00801741029820), received between Jan 23, 2018 and Oct 22, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Detachment Of Device Component2
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem2
- Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Material Invagination1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Patient Involvement3
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Depression1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Pain1
- Urinary Tract Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 22, 2024Material Invagination; Material Invagination
IT WAS REPORTED THAT IN (B)(6) 2021 PATIENT HAD A PROSTATE OPERATION WHICH REQUIRED AN OVERNIGHT FOLEY CATHETER. WHEN THE NURSE ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE CATHETER, THE NURSE COULD NOT, A SECOND NURSE WAS CALLED WHO COULD NOT EITHER, THEN A DOCTOR WHO COULDN¿T. THE VARIOUS ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE WERE EXTREMELY PAINFUL. THEY FINALLY WITH GREAT EFFORT AND PAIN FOR PATIENT PULLED IT OUT BUT IT SPLIT THE TOP OF PATIENT'S PENIS. THEY SAID IT LOOKED LIKE THE COATING ON THE OUTSIDE OF CATHETER HAD DETACHED AND WRINKLED UP. NOT JUST FOR PAIN AT TIME BUT PATIENT LIFE FELL APART POST OPERATION, THE DELAY IN RECOVERY CAUSED PATIENT TO FALL INTO DEEP DEPRESSION, AND POST OPERATION, PATIENT STILL HAVE A DULL PAIN IN WHICH THE PATIENT THOUGHT MAYBE RELATED TO DAMAGE CAUSED BY REMOVAL. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Depression; Pain
MAUDE report 20504918 ↗InjuryMar 6, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT WITH SPINA BIFIDA TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WITH URINARY TRACT INFECTION. INDWELLING CATHETER REMOVED WAS GUNKY. BARDEX ALL-SILICONE FOLEY CATHETER INSERTED AND DRAINED 20CC. BLADDER SCAN REVEALED 160CC IN BLADDER AND ATTEMPTED TO IRRIGATE CATHETER WITHOUT SUCCESS. FOLEY WAS REMOVED AND ANOTHER ONE TRIED, DRAINED DARK RED URINE WITH SMALL CLOT AND THERE WAS NO KNOWN HARM TO PATIENT. PER FOLLOW UP 12APR2024, ISSUE WAS NOT NOTICED PRIOR TO USE AND PATIENT STATUS WAS UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 18845547 ↗MalfunctionNov 12, 2019Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HOSPITAL RECEIVED 18F CATHETERS INSTEAD OF 20FR CATHETERS AS THE LABEL STATED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9310194 ↗MalfunctionJul 2, 2019Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Inadequate Instructions for Healthcare Professional; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE OUTER PACKAGING WAS LABELED FOR REFERENCE NUMBER (B)(4) BUT THE REFERENCE NUMBER ON THE INSIDE OF THE PACKAGING WAS (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8754768 ↗MalfunctionMar 20, 2018Break; Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE OFF. IT WAS LATER REPORTED THAT THE LUMEN OF THE BALLOON DETACHED FROM THE CATHETER. THE EVENT HAPPENED OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7353707 ↗MalfunctionJan 23, 2018Break; Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF THE CATHETER BROKE OFF. THIS WAS THE SECOND INCIDENT WITH THIS PRODUCT. IT WAS LATER REPORTED, THE LUMEN OF THE BALLOON HAD DETACHED FROM THE CATHETER, OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7213831 ↗
Other CATHETER, URETHRAL devices
- Bardex® All-Silicone Foley Catheter 165814C. R. Bard, Inc. · CATHETER, URETHRAL275 reports
- GENTLECATH 421911Convatec, Purchasing Department · Catheter, Urethral234 reports
- GENTLECATH 421910Convatec, Purchasing Department · Catheter, Urethral122 reports
- CURE CATHETER M16CConvatec, Purchasing Department · Catheter, Urethral95 reports
- GENTLECATH 421909Convatec, Purchasing Department · Catheter, Urethral66 reports
- BD Intermittent RTU14FHangzhou Bever Medical Devices Co., Ltd. · Catheter, Urethral1 recall3 reports
- Onli 82144Hollister Incorporated · CATHETER, URETHRAL1 recall1 report
- Onli 82164Hollister Incorporated · CATHETER, URETHRAL1 recall1 report
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page